Failure Cases Are Better Learned but Boundary Says Sorry: Facilitating Smooth Perception Change for Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off in Adversarial Training
Yanyun Wang, Li Liu
Abstract
Adversarial Training (AT) is one of the most effective methods to train robust Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). However, AT creates an inherent trade-off between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness, which is commonly attributed to the more complicated decision boundary caused by the insufficient learning of hard adversarial samples. In this work, we reveal a counterintuitive fact for the first time: From the perspective of perception consistency, hard adversarial samples that can still attack the robust model after AT are already learned better than those successfully defended. Thus, different from previous views, we argue that it is rather the over-sufficient learning of hard adversarial samples that degrades the decision boundary and contributes to the trade-off problem. Specifically, the excessive pursuit of perception consistency would force the model to view the perturbations as noise and ignore the information within them, which should have been utilized to induce a smoother perception transition towards the decision boundary to support its establishment to an appropriate location. In response, we define a new AT objective named Robust Perception, encouraging the model perception to change smoothly with input perturbations, based on which we propose a novel Robust Perception Adversarial Training (RPAT) method, effectively mitigating the current accuracy-robustness trade-off. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet with ResNet-18, PreActResNet-18, and WideResNet-34-10 demonstrate the effectiveness of our method beyond four common baselines and 12 state-of-the-art (SOTA) works. The code is available at https://github.com/FlaAI/RPAT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86a463f3-345b-40ed-9c45-065d958ebc04Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
Related papers
- Consistency Regularization for Adversarial RobustnessJihoon Tack, Sihyun Yu, Jongheon Jeong, Minseon Kim et al.AAAI 2022 · 75 citations
- Adversarial Finetuning with Latent Representation Constraint to Mitigate Accuracy-Robustness TradeoffSatoshi Suzuki, Shin'ya Yamaguchi, Shoichiro Takeda, Sekitoshi Kanai et al.ICCV 2023 · 8 citations
- Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and GeneralizationGuang Lin, Chao Li, Jianhai Zhang, Toshihisa Tanaka et al.ICLR 2024 · 25 citations
- Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat ModelsCassidy Laidlaw, Sahil Singla, Soheil FeiziICLR 2021 · 217 citations
- Reducing Excessive Margin to Achieve a Better Accuracy vs. Robustness Trade-offRahul Rade, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2022 · 166 citations
