Acoustic Interference: A New Paradigm Weaponizing Acoustic Latent Semantic for Universal Jailbreak against Large Audio Language Models
Yanyun Wang, Yu Huang, Zi Liang, Xixin Wu, Li Liu
Abstract
The integration of audio modality into Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) significantly expands their attack surface. Existing jailbreak paradigms predominantly treat audio as a carrier for malicious payloads, relying on semantic optimization, acoustic parameter control, or additive perturbation to embed harmful content into the audio signal. In this work, we challenge this necessity and propose a new paradigm in which the role of audio shifts from content injection to safety alignment interference. We reveal that LALM safety alignment can be compromised solely by specific Acoustic Latent Semantics (ALS), the underlying paralinguistic features intrinsic to the priors of audio generative models. Distinct from previous works that leverage explicit acoustic parameters to merely style malicious audio, we demonstrate that interference audio, benign in content but infused with specific ALS, can serve as a universal jailbreak trigger. Leveraging this insight, we propose the Acoustic Interference Attack (AIA), which decouples the attack payload from the audio. Specifically, AIA employs a set of universal, instruction-neutral interference audio, enabling standard malicious text queries to bypass safety alignment without instance-specific optimization. Extensive experiments on 10 LALMs across five datasets demonstrate that AIA achieves the state-of-the-art attack success rate. Furthermore, our interpretability analysis uncovers the inference path drift induced by AIA and identifies the inherent effective patterns within ALS, revealing the fundamental vulnerability of cross-modal alignment in LALMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 39390f6b-4c6c-40b5-9f0a-a34f682ed0ffBuilds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
- Poisoning Language Models During Instruction TuningAlexander Wan, Eric Wallace, Sheng Shen, Dan KleinICML 2023 · 319 citations
- WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language ModelsLiwei Jiang, Kavel Rao, Seungju Han, Allyson Ettinger et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 247 citations
Related papers
- JALMBench: Benchmarking Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in Audio Language ModelsZifan Peng, Yule Liu, Zhen Sun, Mingchen Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- ALMGuard: Safety Shortcuts and Where to Find Them as Guardrails for Audio-Language ModelsWeifei Jin, Yuxin Cao, Junjie Su, Minhui Xue et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Audio Jailbreak: An Open Comprehensive Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Audio-Language ModelsZirui Song, Qian Jiang, Mingxuan Cui, Mingzhe Li et al.ACL 2026 · 20 citations
- Hijacking Large Audio-Language Models via Context-Agnostic and Imperceptible Auditory Prompt InjectionMeng Chen, Kun Wang, Li Lu, Jiaheng Zhang et al.S&P 2026 · 3 citations
- Evaluating Robustness of Large Audio Language Models to Audio Injection: An Empirical StudyGuanyu Hou, Jiaming He, Yinhang Zhou, Ji Guo et al.EMNLP 2025 · 9 citations
