LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual Tokens in LLMs
Benno Krojer, Perampalli Shravan Nayak, Oscar Mañas, Vaibhav Adlakha, Desmond Elliott, Siva Reddy, Marius Mosbach
Abstract
Transforming a large language model (LLM) into a vision-language model (VLM) can be achieved by mapping the visual tokens from a vision encoder into the embedding space of an LLM. Intriguingly, this mapping can be as simple as a shallow MLP transformation. To understand why LLMs can so readily process visual tokens, we need interpretability methods that reveal what is encoded in the visual token representations at every layer of LLM processing. In this work, we introduce LatentLens, a novel approach for mapping latent representations to descriptions in natural language. LatentLens encodes a large text corpus and stores contextualized token representations for each token in that corpus. Visual token representations are then compared to these contextualized representations and the top- nearest neighbor representations serve as descriptions of the visual token. We evaluate this method on 15 different VLMs, showing that commonly used methods, such as LogitLens, substantially underestimate the interpretability of visual tokens. With LatentLens instead, the majority of visual tokens are interpretable across all studied models and all layers. Qualitatively, we show that the descriptions produced by LatentLens are semantically meaningful and provide more fine-grained interpretations for humans compared to individual tokens. More broadly, our findings contribute new evidence on the alignment between vision and language representations and open up new directions for analyzing the latent representations of LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 847be641-d643-48c6-b9f5-ef23ab55d72dBuilds on36
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language ModelsMaria Tsimpoukelli, Jacob Menick, Serkan Cabi, S. M. Ali Eslami et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,020 citations
Related papers
- What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language ModelsYingqi Fan, Junlong Tong, Anhao Zhao, Xiaoyu ShenCVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language ModelsClement Neo, Luke Ong, Philip Torr, Mor Geva et al.ICLR 2025
- LangBridge: Interpreting Image as a Combination of Language EmbeddingsJiaqi Liao, Yuwei Niu, Fanqing Meng, Hao Li et al.ICCV 2025
- A Concept-Based Explainability Framework for Large Multimodal ModelsJayneel Parekh, Pegah Khayatan, Mustafa Shukor, Alasdair Newson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
- A More Word-like Image Tokenization for MLLMsHyun Lee, Hyemin Jeong, Yejin Kim, Hyungwook Choi et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
