What Do Visual Tokens Really Encode? Uncovering Sparsity and Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models
Yingqi Fan, Junlong Tong, Anhao Zhao, Xiaoyu Shen
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) project visual tokens into the embedding space of language models, yet the internal structuring and processing of visual semantics remain poorly understood. In this work, we introduce a two-fold analytical framework featuring a novel probing tool, EmbedLens, to conduct a fine-grained analysis. We uncover a pronounced semantic sparsity at the input level: visual tokens consistently partition into sink, dead, and alive categories. Remarkably, only the alive tokens, comprising ≈ 60% of the total input, carry image-specific meaning. Furthermore, using a targeted patch-compression benchmark, we demonstrate that these alive tokens already encode rich, fine-grained cues (e.g., objects, colors, and OCR) prior to entering the LLM. Internal visual computations (such as visual attention and feed-forward networks) are redundant for most standard tasks. For the small subset of highly vision-centric tasks that actually benefit from internal processing, we reveal that alive tokens naturally align with intermediate LLM layers rather than the initial embedding space, indicating that shallow-layer processing is unnecessary and that direct mid-layer injection is both sufficient. Ultimately, our findings provide a unified mechanistic view of visual token processing, paving the way for more efficient and interpretable MLLM architectures through selective token pruning, minimized visual computation, and mid-layer injection.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7639254d-8dbe-4e72-8864-56be5337c3d3Cited by top-tier papers2
- Think-as-You-See: Streaming Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Large Vision-Language ModelsJialiang Zhang, Junlong Tong, Junyan Lin, Hao Wu et al.CVPR 2026 · 6 citations
- ProactiveLLM: Learning Active Interaction for Streaming Large Language ModelsJunlong Tong, Yao Zhang, Anhao Zhao, Yingqi Fan et al.ICML 2026
Builds on27
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention SinksGuangxuan Xiao, Yuandong Tian, Beidi Chen, Song Han et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,714 citations
Related papers
- Boosting Multimodal Large Language Models with Visual Tokens Withdrawal for Rapid InferenceZhihang Lin, Mingbao Lin, Luxi Lin, Rongrong JiAAAI 2025 · 121 citations
- LatentLens: Revealing Highly Interpretable Visual Tokens in LLMsBenno Krojer, Perampalli Shravan Nayak, Oscar Mañas, Vaibhav Adlakha et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Efficient Segmentation with Multimodal Large Language Model via Token RoutingChangsong Wen, Zelin Peng, Yu Huang, Wei ShenAAAI 2026
- Hi-Lo Prune: Look at What You'll Lose before Pruning with Hierarchical Token SelectionZixun Sun, Yubo Dong, Hehe Fan, Yi YangCVPR 2026
- Lifting the Veil on Visual Information Flow in MLLMs: Unlocking Pathways to Faster InferenceHao Yin, Guangzong Si, Zilei WangCVPR 2025
