Alleviating Shifted Distribution in Human Preference Alignment through Meta-Learning
Shihan Dou, Yan Liu, Enyu Zhou, Songyang Gao, Tianlong Li, Limao Xiong, Xin Zhao, Haoxiang Jia, Junjie Ye, Rui Zheng, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Abstract
The capability of the reward model (RM) is crucial for the success of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in aligning with human preferences. However, as training progresses, the output space distribution of the policy model shifts. The RM, initially trained on responses sampled from the output distribution of the early policy model, gradually loses its ability to distinguish between responses from the newly shifted distribution. This issue is further compounded when the RM, trained on a specific data distribution, struggles to generalize to examples outside of that distribution. These two issues can be united as a challenge posed by the shifted distribution of the environment. To surmount this challenge, we introduce MetaRM, a novel method leveraging meta-learning to adapt the RM to the shifted environment distribution. MetaRM optimizes the RM in an alternating way, by preserving both the preferences of the original preference pairs, as well as maximizing discrimination power over new examples of the shifted distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MetaRM can iteratively enhance the performance of human preference alignment by improving the RM's capacity to identify subtle differences in samples of shifted distributions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 847a4148-eead-40a8-999a-8692d19e162dBuilds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
Related papers
- Real-Time Aligned Reward Model beyond SemanticsZixuan Huang, Xin Xia, Yuxi Ren, Jianbin Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM AlignmentHongru Cai, Yongqi Li, Tiezheng Yu, Fengbin Zhu et al.SIGIR 2026
- DARM: Distribution-Aware Reward Modeling by Alleviating Biases from Low Preference-Context Dependency DataShaofan Liu, Guoqiang Zhang, Shihan Dou, Huiyuan Zheng et al.ACL 2026
- Nash Learning from Human FeedbackRémi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
