One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment
Hongru Cai, Yongqi Li, Tiezheng Yu, Fengbin Zhu, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Wenjie Li
Abstract
Alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) aims to align outputs with human preferences, and personalized alignment further adapts models to individual users. This relies on personalized reward models that capture user-specific preferences and automatically provide individualized feedback. However, developing these models faces two critical challenges: the scarcity of feedback from individual users and the need for efficient adaptation to unseen users. We argue that addressing these constraints requires a paradigm shift from fitting static user models to ''learning to learn'' adaptation. To realize this, we propose Meta Reward Modeling (MRM), which reformulates personalized reward modeling as a meta-learning problem. Specifically, we represent each user's reward model as a weighted combination of base reward functions, and optimize the initialization of these weights using a Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML)-style framework to support fast adaptation under limited feedback. To ensure robustness, we introduce the Robust Personalization Objective (RPO), which places greater emphasis on hard-to-learn users during meta optimization. Extensive experiments on personalized preference datasets validate that MRM enhances few-shot personalization, improves user robustness, and consistently outperforms baselines. We release code at https://github.com/ModalityDance/MRM.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 63321ce3-8bb4-48da-a31b-97e232ec5766Builds on25
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
Related papers
- Alleviating Shifted Distribution in Human Preference Alignment through Meta-LearningShihan Dou, Yan Liu, Enyu Zhou, Songyang Gao et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- MTA: A Merge-then-Adapt Framework for Personalized Large Language ModelsXiaopeng Li, Yuanjin Zheng, Wanyu Wang, Wenlin Zhang et al.ACL 2026
- CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMsYoungbin Choi, Seunghyuk Cho, Minjong Lee, MoonJeong Park et al.EMNLP 2025
- Group Preference Optimization: Few-Shot Alignment of Large Language ModelsSiyan Zhao, John Dang, Aditya GroverICLR 2024 · 54 citations
- P-GenRM: Personalized Generative Reward Model with Test-time User-based ScalingPinyi Zhang, Ting-En Lin, Yuchuan Wu, Jingyang Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
