Tweet Trajectory and AMPS-based Contextual Cues can Help Users Identify Misinformation
Himanshu Zade, Megan Woodruff, Erika Johnson, Mariah Stanley, Zhennan Zhou, Minh Tu Huynh, Alissa Elizabeth Acheson, Gary Hsieh, Kate Starbird
Abstract
Well-intentioned users sometimes enable the spread of misinformation due to limited context about where the information originated and/or why it is spreading. Building upon recommendations based on prior research about tackling misinformation, we explore the potential to support media literacy through platform design. We develop and design an intervention consisting of a tweet trajectory-to illustrate how information reached a user-and contextual cues-to make credibility judgments about accounts that amplify, manufacture, produce or situate in the vicinity of problematic content (AMPS). Using a research through design approach, we demonstrate how the proposed intervention can help discern credible actors, challenge blind faith amongst online friends, evaluate the cost of associating with online actors, and expose hidden agendas. Such facilitation of credibility assessment can encourage more responsible sharing of content. Through our findings, we argue for using trajectory-based designs to support informed information sharing, advocate for feature updates that nudge users with reflective cues, and promote platform-driven media literacy.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; Collaborative and social computing systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Exploring Multidimensional Checkworthiness: Designing AI-assisted Claim Prioritization for Human Fact-checkersHoujiang Liu, Jacek Gwizdka, Matthew LeaseCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Designing Effective AI Explanations for Misinformation Detection: A Comparative Study of Content, Social, and Combined ExplanationsYeaeun Gong, Yifan Liu, Lanyu Shang, Na Wei et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on4
- Fake News on Facebook and Twitter: Investigating How People (Don't) InvestigateChristine Geeng, Savanna Yee, Franziska RoesnerCHI 2020 · 154 citations
- Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook et al.CSCW 2021 · 116 citations
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 104 citations
- Synthesized Social Signals: Computationally-Derived Social Signals from Account HistoriesJane Im, Sonali Tandon, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Taylor Denby et al.CHI 2020 · 38 citations
Related papers
- NudgeCred: Supporting News Credibility Assessment on Social Media Through NudgesMd Momen Bhuiyan, Michael A. Horning, Sang Won Lee, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2021 · 72 citations
- Fakey: A Game Intervention to Improve News Literacy on Social MediaNicholas Micallef, Mihai Avram, Filippo Menczer, Sameer PatilCSCW 2021 · 39 citations
- Reviewing Interventions to Address Misinformation: The Need to Expand Our Vision Beyond an Individualistic FocusZhila Aghajari, Eric P. S. Baumer, Dominic DiFranzoCSCW 2023 · 48 citations
- Leveraging Structured Trusted-Peer Assessments to Combat MisinformationFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, David R. KargerCSCW 2022 · 41 citations
- Envisioning Interventions to Combat Misinformation Propagation on Social Media: Insights from Older Adults' Approaches to Credibility AssessmentIshita Haque, Jiamin Dai, Joanna McGrenereCSCW 2025
