Lune

ICLR2026Top-tier venue

From Curiosity to Caution: Mitigating Reward Hacking for Best-of-NN with Pessimism

Zhuohao Yu, Steven Z. Wu, Adam Block

2026Year
3Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Inference-time compute scaling has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving language model performance on a wide range of tasks, but the question of how best to use the additional compute remains open. A popular approach is Best-of-NN (BoN) sampling, where NN candidate responses are generated, scored according to a reward model, and the highest-scoring response is selected. While this approach can improve performance, it is vulnerable to reward hacking, where performance degrades as NN increases due to the selection of responses that exploit imperfections in the reward model instead of genuinely improving generation quality. Prior attempts to mitigate reward hacking---via stronger reward models or heavy-handed distributional regularization---either fail to fully address over-optimization or are too conservative to exploit additional compute. In this work, we explore the principle of pessimism in reinforcement learning (RL), which uses lower confidence bounds on value estimates to avoid out-of-distribution (OOD) actions with uncertain reward estimates. Our approach, termed as caution, can be seen as the reverse of curiosity: where curiosity (e.g., via Random Network Distillation, RND) rewards prediction error as a signal of novelty, caution penalizes prediction error as a signal of distributional uncertainty. Practically, caution trains an error model on typical responses and uses its prediction error to lower reward estimates for atypical ones. Our extensive empirical evaluation demonstrates that caution is a simple, computationally efficient approach that substantially mitigates reward hacking in BoN sampling. We also provide a theoretical analysis in a simplified linear setting, which shows that caution provably improves over the standard BoN approach. Together, our results not only establish caution as a practical solution to reward hacking, but also provide evidence that curiosity-based approaches can be a general OOD detection technique in LLM settings.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 843f07d4-8d3f-4d91-83c2-ed3d83db6b4d

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on26

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines