Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces
Angeliki Kamoutsi, Peter Schmitt-Förster, Tobias Sutter, Volkan Cevher, John Lygeros
Abstract
This work studies discrete-time discounted Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces and addresses the inverse problem of inferring a cost function from observed optimal behavior. We first consider the case in which we have access to the entire expert policy and characterize the set of solutions to the inverse problem by using occupation measures, linear duality, and complementary slackness conditions. To avoid trivial solutions and ill-posedness, we introduce a natural linear normalization constraint. This results in an infinite-dimensional linear feasibility problem, prompting a thorough analysis of its properties. Next, we use linear function approximators and adopt a randomized approach, namely the scenario approach and related probabilistic feasibility guarantees, to derive epsilon-optimal solutions for the inverse problem. We further discuss the sample complexity for a desired approximation accuracy. Finally, we deal with the more realistic case where we only have access to a finite set of expert demonstrations and a generative model and provide bounds on the error made when working with samples.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse RewardsSiddharth Reddy, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution MatchingIlya Kostrikov, Ofir Nachum, Jonathan TompsonICLR 2020 · 239 citations
- Active Exploration for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDavid Lindner, Andreas Krause, Giorgia RamponiNeurIPS 2022 · 36 citations
- Provably Efficient Learning of Transferable RewardsAlberto Maria Metelli, Giorgia Ramponi, Alessandro Concetti, Marcello RestelliICML 2021 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDexter R. R. Scobee, S. Shankar SastryICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Inverse Optimal Control Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Human Sensorimotor SystemMatthias Schultheis, Dominik Straub, Constantin A. RothkopfNeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Efficient Performance Bounds for Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning from DemonstrationsAngeliki Kamoutsi, Goran Banjac, John LygerosICML 2021 · 9 citations
- Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningHaoyang Cao, Samuel N. Cohen, Lukasz SzpruchNeurIPS 2021 · 72 citations
- Sub-optimal Experts mitigate Ambiguity in Inverse Reinforcement LearningRiccardo Poiani, Gabriele Curti, Alberto Maria Metelli, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
