Eliciting Language Model Behaviors with Investigator Agents
Xiang Lisa Li, Neil Chowdhury, Daniel D. Johnson, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Percy Liang, Sarah Schwettmann, Jacob Steinhardt
Abstract
Language models exhibit complex, diverse behaviors when prompted with free-form text, making it difficult to characterize the space of possible outputs. We study the problem of behavior elicitation, where the goal is to search for prompts that induce specific target behaviors (e.g., hallucinations or harmful responses) from a target language model. To navigate the exponentially large space of possible prompts, we train investigator models to map randomly-chosen target behaviors to a diverse distribution of outputs that elicit them, similar to amortized Bayesian inference. We do this through supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning via DPO, and a novel Frank-Wolfe training objective to iteratively discover diverse prompting strategies. Our investigator models surface a variety of effective and human-interpretable prompts leading to jailbreaks, hallucinations, and open-ended aberrant behaviors, obtaining a 100% attack success rate on a subset of AdvBench (Harmful Behaviors) and an 85% hallucination rate.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural LanguageAlexander Pan, Lijie Chen, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2026 · 31 citations
- Searching for Privacy Risks in LLM Agents via SimulationYanzhe Zhang, Diyi YangICLR 2026 · 21 citations
- RepIt: Steering Language Models with Concept-Specific Refusal VectorsVincent Siu, Nathan W. Henry, Nicholas Crispino, Yang Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM HallucinationsBuyun Liang, Liangzu Peng, Jinqi Luo, Darshan Thaker et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use AgentsJaylen Jones, Zhehao Zhang, Yuting Ning, Eric Fosler-Lussier et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on10
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
- Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional ConversationsNing Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin et al.EMNLP 2023 · 95 citations
Related papers
- Large Language Models Are Involuntary Truth-Tellers: Exploiting Fallacy Failure for Jailbreak AttacksYue Zhou, Henry Peng Zou, Barbara Di Eugenio, Yang ZhangEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Private Investigator: Extracting Personally Identifiable Information from Large Language Models Using Optimized PromptsSeongho Keum, Dongwon Shin, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM FinetuningThibaud Gloaguen, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin VechevICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- When LLM Meets DRL: Advancing Jailbreaking Efficiency via DRL-guided SearchXuan Chen, Yuzhou Nie, Wenbo Guo, Xiangyu ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 68 citations
- VERA: Variational Inference Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language ModelsAnamika Lochab, Lu Yan, Patrick Pynadath, Xiangyu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
