RepIt: Steering Language Models with Concept-Specific Refusal Vectors
Vincent Siu, Nathan W. Henry, Nicholas Crispino, Yang Liu, Dawn Song, Chenguang Wang
Abstract
Current safety evaluations of language models rely on benchmark-based assessments that may miss localized vulnerabilities. We present REPIT, a simple and data-efficient framework for isolating concept-specific representations in LM activations. While existing steering methods already achieve high attack success rates through broad interventions, REPIT enables a more concerning capability: selective suppression of refusal on targeted concepts while preserving refusal elsewhere. Across five frontier LMs, REPIT produces evaluation-evading model organisms with semantic backdoors, answering questions related to weapons of mass destruction while still scoring as safe on standard benchmarks. We find the edit of the steering vector localizes to just 100-200 residual dimensions, and robust concept vectors can be extracted from as few as a dozen examples on a single RTX A6000, highlighting how targeted, hard-to-detect modifications can exploit evaluation blind spots with minimal resources. Through demonstrating precise concept disentanglement, this work exposes vulnerabilities in current safety evaluation practices and demonstrates a need for more comprehensive, representationaware assessments. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 27af2065-1c97-4a19-b15c-7c4c9ef1237bCited by top-tier papers2
- One Bias After Another: Mechanistic Reward Shaping and Persistent Biases in Language Reward ModelsDaniel Fein, Max Lamparth, Violet Xiang, Mykel Kochenderfer et al.ICML 2026
- Tracing the Dynamics of Refusal: Exploiting Latent Refusal Trajectories for Robust Jailbreak DetectionXulin Hu, CHE WANG, Wei Yang Bryan Lim, Jianbo Gao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- The Geometry of Refusal in Large Language Models: Concept Cones and Representational IndependenceTom Wollschläger, Jannes Elstner, Simon Geisler, Vincent Cohen-Addad et al.ICML 2025
- RepGuard: Adaptive Feature Decoupling for Robust Backdoor Defense in Large Language ModelsChenxu Niu, Jie M. Zhang, Yanbing Liu, Yunpeng Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Representation Bending for Large Language Model SafetyAshkan Yousefpour, Taeheon Kim, Ryan Sungmo Kwon, Seungbeen Lee et al.ACL 2025 · 19 citations
- SOM Directions Are Better than One: Multi-Directional Refusal Suppression in Language ModelsGiorgio Piras, Raffaele Mura, Fabio Brau, Luca Oneto et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Compiling Activation Steering into Weights via Null-Space Constraints for Stealthy BackdoorsRui Yin, Tianxu Han, Naen Xu, Changjiang Li et al.ACL 2026
