Dyve: Thinking Fast and Slow for Dynamic Process Verification
Jianyuan Zhong, Zeju Li, Zhijian Xu, Xiangyu Wen, Qiang Xu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced significantly in complex reasoning, often leveraging external verifiers to improve multi-step process reliability. However, existing process verification methods face critical limitations: discriminative Process Reward Models (PRMs) often provide overly simplistic binary feedback and struggle with incomplete reasoning traces, while sophisticated Generative Reward Models (GenRMs) can be computationally expensive. Furthermore, curating quality supervision data for process verifier is of challenging. Therefore, we present Dyve, a dynamic process verifier that enhances reasoning error detection in LLMs by integrating fast (System 1) and slow (System 2) thinking, inspired by Kahneman's Systems Theory. Dyve adaptively applies immediate token-level confirmation for straightforward steps and comprehensive analysis for complex ones. To address data challenges and enable its adaptive fast and slow thinking, Dyve employs a novel step-wise consensus-filtered supervision strategy. This strategy leverages Monte Carlo estimation, LLM-as-a-Judge, and specialized reasoning models to extract the high-quality training signals from noisy rollouts. Experimental results on ProcessBench and the MATH dataset confirm that Dyve significantly outperforms existing process-based verifiers and boosts performance in Best-of-N settings, while maintaining computational efficiency through strategic resource allocation. Our code, data and model are released at: https://github.com/ staymylove/Dyve
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8349b397-e979-451f-9056-7420bb1e9822Cited by top-tier papers3
- Making Slow Thinking Faster: Compressing LLM Chain-of-Thought via Step EntropyZeju Li, Jianyuan Zhong, Ziyang Zheng, Xiangyu Wen et al.ICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- Is PRM Necessary? Problem-Solving RL Implicitly Induces PRM Capability in LLMsZhangyin Feng, Qianglong Chen, Ning Lu, Yongqian Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Solve-Detect-Verify: Inference-Time Scaling with Flexible Generative VerifierJianyuan Zhong, Zeju Li, Zhijian Xu, Xiangyu Wen et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on5
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical ReasoningChujie Zheng, Zhenru Zhang, Beichen Zhang, Runji Lin et al.ACL 2025 · 209 citations
- OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific ProblemsChaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu et al.ACL 2024 · 18 citations
- Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language ModelsBofei Gao, Feifan Song, Zhe Yang, Zefan Cai et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human AnnotationsPeiyi Wang, Lei Li, Zhihong Shao, Runxin Xu et al.ACL 2024
Related papers
- AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised VerifierJianqiao Lu, Zhiyang Dou, Hongru Wang, Zeyu Cao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- Rectifying LLM Thought from Lens of OptimizationJunnan Liu, Hongwei Liu, Songyang Zhang, Kai ChenICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Unlocking the Power of Multi-Agent LLM for Reasoning: From Lazy Agents to DeliberationZhiwei Zhang, Xiaomin Li, Yudi Lin, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative ReasoningJian Zhao, Runze Liu, Kaiyan Zhang, Zhimu Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 68 citations
- Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaoyuan Liu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jiahao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
