OursFed: Provable Group Fairness-Aware Federated Learning Against Distrust and Fragility
Yun Xin, Jianfeng Lu, Gang Li, Shuqin Cao, Guanghui Wen, Kehao Wang
Abstract
With the increasing application of high-stakes decisionmaking application in Federated Learning (FL), ensuring fairness across different populations to prevent biases against certain groups has become crucial. However, achieving group fairness (GF) in FL presents a formidable challenge due to its decentralization, which complicates the global GF estimation by the server. Moreover, distrust and fragility hinder the server from gathering GF values from unreliable clients. This challenge motivates our proposal of OursFed, a provable GF-aware FL framework that integrates a privacy pairbased contract and robust GF estimation method to address issues of distrust and fragility. Methodologically, we categorize client unreliability into two categories: active unreliability stemming from distrust and passive unreliability arising from fragility. To mitigate active unreliability, we design a privacy pair-based contract to guarantee truthful GF reporting, and enhance multivariate analysis by identifying relationships among multiple private data. To counteract passive unreliability, we develop a robust GF estimation using non-parametric techniques to smooth data and estimate probability densities and regression functions, improving per-client GF accuracy under multi-dimensional data perturbation. Theoretically, we demonstrate the efficacy of OursFed by analyzing its convergence, GF stability, and accuracy deviation. Experimentally, evaluations on two real datasets show that OursFed improves GF by 28.61% with at most 2.7% trade-off versus state-ofthe-art baselines, and synthetic experiments further confirm its effectiveness in handling fragility and distrust.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 82ff8b34-7842-49cc-9bf2-46592b7b34b2Builds on9
- FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated LearningYahya H. Ezzeldin, Shen Yan, Chaoyang He, Emilio Ferrara et al.AAAI 2023 · 310 citations
- A Fair Classifier Using Kernel Density EstimationJaewoong Cho, Gyeongjo Hwang, Changho SuhNeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
- Generalized Demographic Parity for Group FairnessZhimeng Jiang, Xiaotian Han, Chao Fan, Fan Yang et al.ICLR 2022 · 71 citations
- Incentives in Federated Learning: Equilibria, Dynamics, and Mechanisms for Welfare MaximizationAniket Murhekar, Zhuowen Yuan, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 37 citations
- AoI-aware Incentive Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing using Stackelberg GameMingjun Xiao, Yin Xu, Jinrui Zhou, Jie Wu et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 35 citations
Related papers
- FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated LearningLi Zhang, Zhongxuan Han, Xiaohua Feng, Jiaming Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Noise-Aware Algorithm for Heterogeneous Differentially Private Federated LearningSaber Malekmohammadi, Yaoliang Yu, Yang CaoICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Multi-Dimensional Fair Federated LearningCong Su, Guoxian Yu, Jun Wang, Hui Li et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Fair Federated Survival AnalysisMd Mahmudur Rahman, Sanjay PurushothamAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- FedVal: Different good or different bad in federated learningViktor Valadi, Xinchi Qiu, Pedro Porto Buarque de Gusmão, Nicholas D. Lane et al.USENIX Security 2023
