"Finding the Magic Sauce": Exploring Perspectives of Recruiters and Job Seekers on Recruitment Bias and Automated Tools
Mitra Lashkari, Jinghui Cheng
Abstract
Automated recruitment tools are proliferating. While having the promise of improving efficiency, various risks, including bias, challenges the potential of these tools. An in-depth understanding of the perceived risk factors and needs from the perspective of both recruiters and job seekers is needed. We address this through an interview study in the high-tech industry to compare and contrast the concerns of these two roles. We found that the importance of clarifying position requirements and assessing candidates as “whole individuals” are commonly discussed by both recruiters and job seekers. In contrast, while recruiters tended to be more aware of cognitive bias and desired more tool support during interviews, job seekers voiced more desire towards a healthy candidate-company relationship. Additionally, both roles considered the uncertainty of the current technology capability and reduced human contact as concerns for using automated tools. Based on these results, we provided design implications for automated recruitment tools and related decision-support technologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Collaborative Job Seeking for People with Autism: Challenges and Design OpportunitiesZinat Ara, Amrita Ganguly, Donna Peppard, Dongjun Chung et al.CHI 2024 · 20 citations
- How Do HCI Researchers Study Cognitive Biases? A Scoping ReviewNattapat Boonprakong, Benjamin Tag, Jorge Gonçalves, Tilman DinglerCHI 2025 · 19 citations
- Interrogating AI: Characterizing Emergent Playful Interactions with ChatGPTMohammad Ronagh Nikghalb, Jinghui ChengCSCW 2025 · 12 citations
- The Accessibility Paradox: How Blind and Low Vision Employees Experience and Negotiate Accessibility in the Technology IndustryAparajita Marathe, Anne Marie PiperCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Value Sensitive Design for Fair Online Recruitment: A Conceptual Framework Informed by Job seekers’ Fairness ConcernsChangyang He, Yue Deng, Alessandro Fabris, Bo Li et al.CSCW 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Positive Feedback and Self-Reflection: Features to Support Self-efficacy among Underrepresented Job SeekersTawanna R. Dillahunt, Joey Chiao-Yin HsiaoCHI 2020 · 35 citations
- Race, Gender and Beauty: The Effect of Information Provision on Online Hiring BiasesWeiwen Leung, Zheng Zhang, Daviti Jibuti, Jinhao Zhao et al.CHI 2020 · 24 citations
- Are You One of Us?: Current Hiring Practices Suggest the Potential for Class Biases in Large Tech CompaniesPhoebe K. Chua, Melissa MazmanianCSCW 2020 · 23 citations
Related papers
- U.S. Job-Seekers' Organizational Justice Perceptions of Emotion AI-Enabled InterviewsCassidy Pyle, Kat Roemmich, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2024 · 19 citations
- Navigating Automated Hiring: Perceptions, Strategy Use, and Outcomes Among Young Job SeekersLena Armstrong, Danaé MetaxaCSCW 2025 · 7 citations
- Skin-Deep Bias: How Avatar Appearances Shape Perceptions of AI HiringKa Hei Carrie Lau, Philipp Stark, Efe Bozkir, Enkelejda KasneciCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Prestige and Prejudice: How the Interplay of Recruiting Work and Algorithms Reinforces Social Inequities in Software EngineeringAustin Biehl, Daniela Perez, Jessica Ingle, Morgan G. AmesCHI 2025 · 2 citations
- Practical Perspectives on Fairness In Technology-Aided Personnel SelectionIvana Müller, Katja Dill, Helena MihaljevicCSCW 2025
