Value Sensitive Design for Fair Online Recruitment: A Conceptual Framework Informed by Job seekers’ Fairness Concerns
Changyang He, Yue Deng, Alessandro Fabris, Bo Li, Asia J. Biega
Abstract
The susceptibility to biases and discrimination is a pressing issue in today's labor markets. While digital recruitment systems play an increasingly significant role in human resource management, a systematic understanding of human-centered design principles for fair online hiring remains lacking, particularly considering the gap between idealized conceptualizations of fairness in research and actual fairness concerns expressed by job seekers. To address this gap, this work explores the potential of developing a fair recruitment framework based on job seekers' fairness concerns shared in r/jobs, one of the largest online job communities. Through a grounded theory approach, we uncover four overarching themes of job seekers' fairness concerns: personal attribute discrimination beyond legally protected attributes, interaction biases, improper interpretations of qualifications, and power imbalance. Drawing on value sensitive design, we derive design implications for fair algorithms and interfaces in recruitment systems, integrating them into a conceptual framework that spans different hiring stages.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d81fb45c-c1ff-403a-9e24-cdec8bed3896Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided PlatformsGourab K. Patro, Arpita Biswas, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P. Gummadi et al.WWW 2020 · 268 citations
- Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual DifferencesRuotong Wang, F. Maxwell Harper, Haiyi ZhuCHI 2020 · 209 citations
- Will the Crowd Game the Algorithm?: Using Layperson Judgments to Combat Misinformation on Social Media by Downranking Distrusted SourcesZiv Epstein, Gordon Pennycook, David G. RandCHI 2020 · 68 citations
- Guidelines for Integrating Value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI ToolkitsMalak Sadek, Marios Constantinides, Daniele Quercia, Céline MougenotCHI 2024 · 49 citations
- Examining the Use of Online Platforms for Employment: A Survey of U.S. Job SeekersTawanna R. Dillahunt, Aarti Israni, Alex Jiahong Lu, Mingzhi Cai et al.CHI 2021 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Asymmetries in Online Job-Seeking: A Case Study of Muslim-American WomenTanisha Afnan, Hawra Rabaan, Kyle M. L. Jones, Lynn DombrowskiCSCW 2021 · 10 citations
- Practical Perspectives on Fairness In Technology-Aided Personnel SelectionIvana Müller, Katja Dill, Helena MihaljevicCSCW 2025
- Skin-Deep Bias: How Avatar Appearances Shape Perceptions of AI HiringKa Hei Carrie Lau, Philipp Stark, Efe Bozkir, Enkelejda KasneciCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "It's the most fair thing to do but it doesn't make any sense": Perceptions of Mathematical Fairness Notions by Hiring ProfessionalsPriya Sarkar, Cynthia C. S. LiemCSCW 2024 · 4 citations
- U.S. Job-Seekers' Organizational Justice Perceptions of Emotion AI-Enabled InterviewsCassidy Pyle, Kat Roemmich, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2024 · 19 citations
