Cert-RNN: Towards Certifying the Robustness of Recurrent Neural Networks
Tianyu Du, Shouling Ji, Lujia Shen, Yao Zhang, Jinfeng Li, Jie Shi, Chengfang Fang, Jianwei Yin, Raheem Beyah, Ting Wang
Abstract
Certifiable robustness, the functionality of verifying whether the given region surrounding a data point admits any adversarial example, provides guaranteed security for neural networks deployed in adversarial environments. A plethora of work has been proposed to certify the robustness of feed-forward networks, e.g., FCNs and CNNs. Yet, most existing methods cannot be directly applied to recurrent neural networks (RNNs), due to their sequential inputs and unique operations. In this paper, we present Cert-RNN, a general framework for certifying the robustness of RNNs. Specifically, through detailed analysis for the intrinsic property of the unique function in different ranges, we exhaustively discuss different cases for the exact formula of bounding planes, based on which we design several precise and efficient abstract transformers for the unique calculations in RNNs. Cert-RNN significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods (e.g., POPQORN) in terms of (i) effectiveness -- it provides much tighter robustness bounds, and (ii) efficiency -- it scales to much more complex models. Through extensive evaluation, we validate Cert-RNN's superior performance across various network architectures (e.g., vanilla RNN and LSTM) and applications (e.g., image classification, sentiment analysis, toxic comment detection, and malicious URL detection). For instance, for the RNN-2-32 model on the MNIST sequence dataset, the robustness bound certified by Cert-RNN is on average 1.86 times larger than that by POPQORN. Besides certifying the robustness of given RNNs, Cert-RNN also enables a range of practical applications including evaluating the provable effectiveness for various defenses (i.e., the defense with a larger robustness region is considered to be more robust), improving the robustness of RNNs (i.e., incorporating Cert-RNN with verified robust training) and identifying sensitive words (i.e., the word with the smallest certified robustness bound is considered to be the most sensitive word in a sentence), which helps build more robust and interpretable deep learning systems. We will open-source Cert-RNN for facilitating the DNN security research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Text-CRS: A Generalized Certified Robustness Framework against Textual Adversarial AttacksXinyu Zhang, Hanbin Hong, Yuan Hong, Peng Huang et al.S&P 2024 · 41 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- "Is your explanation stable?": A Robustness Evaluation Framework for Feature AttributionYuyou Gan, Yuhao Mao, Xuhong Zhang, Shouling Ji et al.CCS 2022 · 13 citations
- Efficient Query-Based Attack against ML-Based Android Malware Detection under Zero Knowledge SettingPing He, Yifan Xia, Xuhong Zhang, Shouling JiCCS 2023 · 13 citations
- CertPri: Certifiable Prioritization for Deep Neural Networks via Movement Cost in Feature SpaceHaibin Zheng, Jinyin Chen, Haibo JinASE 2023 · 11 citations
Builds on7
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world ApplicationsJinfeng Li, Shouling Ji, Tianyu Du, Bo Li et al.NDSS 2019 · 876 citations
- Seq2Sick: Evaluating the Robustness of Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Adversarial ExamplesMinhao Cheng, Jinfeng Yi, Pin-Yu Chen, Huan Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 268 citations
Related papers
- Tighter Truncated Rectangular Prism Approximation for RNN Robustness VerificationXingqi Lin, Liangyu Chen, Min Wu, Min Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- Marble: Model-based Robustness Analysis of Stateful Deep Learning SystemsXiaoning Du, Yi Li, Xiaofei Xie, Lei Ma et al.ASE 2020 · 10 citations
- Robustness Verification for TransformersZhouxing Shi, Huan Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, Minlie Huang et al.ICLR 2020 · 131 citations
- Towards Certificated Model Robustness Against Weight PerturbationsTsui-Wei Weng, Pu Zhao, Sijia Liu, Pin-Yu Chen et al.AAAI 2020 · 33 citations
- Certified Robustness to Programmable Transformations in LSTMsYuhao Zhang, Aws Albarghouthi, Loris D'AntoniEMNLP 2021 · 8 citations
