Heterogeneous Graph Reasoning for Fact Checking over Texts and Tables
Haisong Gong, Weizhi Xu, Shu Wu, Qiang Liu, Liang Wang
Abstract
Fact checking aims to predict claim veracity by reasoning over multiple evidence pieces. It usually involves evidence retrieval and veracity reasoning. In this paper, we focus on the latter, reasoning over unstructured text and structured table information. Previous works have primarily relied on fine-tuning pretrained language models or training homogeneous-graph-based models. Despite their effectiveness, we argue that they fail to explore the rich semantic information underlying the evidence with different structures. To address this, we propose a novel word-level Heterogeneous-graph-based model for Fact Checking over unstructured and structured information, namely HeterFC. Our approach leverages a heterogeneous evidence graph, with words as nodes and thoughtfully designed edges representing different evidence properties. We perform information propagation via a relational graph neural network, facilitating interactions between claims and evidence. An attention-based method is utilized to integrate information, combined with a language model for generating predictions. We introduce a multitask loss function to account for potential inaccuracies in evidence retrieval. Comprehensive experiments on the large fact checking dataset FEVEROUS demonstrate the effectiveness of HeterFC. Code will be released at: https://github.com/Deno-V/HeterFC.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 80bdf251-3693-484e-b964-84a0a556e3feCited by top-tier papers4
- Truth over Tricks: Measuring and Mitigating Shortcut Learning in Misinformation DetectionHerun Wan, Jiaying Wu, Minnan Luo, Zhi Zeng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Combining Evidence and Reasoning for Biomedical Fact-CheckingMariano Barone, Antonio Romano, Giuseppe Riccio, Marco Postiglione et al.SIGIR 2025 · 3 citations
- How Do Social Bots Participate in Misinformation Spread? A Comprehensive Dataset and AnalysisHerun Wan, Minnan Luo, Zihan Ma, Guang Dai et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Enhancing Multi-Hop Fact Verification with Structured Knowledge-Augmented Large Language ModelsHan Cao, Lingwei Wei, Wei Zhou, Songlin HuAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- Reasoning Over Semantic-Level Graph for Fact CheckingWanjun Zhong, Jingjing Xu, Duyu Tang, Zenan Xu et al.ACL 2020 · 154 citations
- Evidence-aware Fake News Detection with Graph Neural NetworksWeizhi Xu, Junfei Wu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu et al.WWW 2022 · 123 citations
- EvidenceNet: Evidence Fusion Network for Fact VerificationZhendong Chen, Siu Cheung Hui, Fuzhen Zhuang, Lejian Liao et al.WWW 2022 · 32 citations
- Counterfactual Debiasing for Fact VerificationWeizhi Xu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Liang WangACL 2023 · 26 citations
- Fine-grained Fact Verification with Kernel Graph Attention NetworkZhenghao Liu, Chenyan Xiong, Maosong Sun, Zhiyuan LiuACL 2020 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing Structured Evidence Extraction for Fact VerificationZirui Wu, Nan Hu, Yansong FengEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- LogicalFactChecker: Leveraging Logical Operations for Fact Checking with Graph Module NetworkWanjun Zhong, Duyu Tang, Zhangyin Feng, Nan Duan et al.ACL 2020 · 51 citations
- Beyond Text: Fine-Grained Multi-Modal Fact Verification with Hypergraph TransformersHui Pang, Chaozhuo Li, Litian Zhang, Senzhang Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- MRR-FV: Unlocking Complex Fact Verification with Multi-Hop Retrieval and ReasoningLiwen Zheng, Chaozhuo Li, Litian Zhang, Haoran Jia et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-CheckingChristopher Hidey, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Tariq Alhindi, Siddharth Varia et al.ACL 2020 · 7 citations
