Real-Time Reasoning Agents in Evolving Environments
Yule Wen, Yixin Ye, Yanzhe Zhang, Diyi Yang, Hao Zhu
Abstract
Agents in the real world must make not only logical but also timely judgments. This requires continuous awareness of the dynamic environment: hazards emerge, opportunities arise, and other agents act, while the agent's reasoning is still unfolding. Despite advances in language model reasoning, existing approaches fail to account for this dynamic nature. We introduce real-time reasoning as a new problem formulation for agents in evolving environments and build Real-Time Reasoning Gym to demonstrate it. We study two paradigms for deploying language models in agents: (1) reactive agents, which employ language models with bounded reasoning computation for rapid responses, and ( 2 ) planning agents, which allow extended reasoning computation for complex problems. Our experiments show that even stateof-the-art models struggle with making logical and timely judgments in either paradigm. To address this limitation, we propose AgileThinker, which simultaneously engages both reasoning paradigms. AgileThinker consistently outperforms agents engaging only one reasoning paradigm as the task difficulty and time pressure rise, effectively balancing reasoning depth and response latency. Our work establishes real-time reasoning as a critical testbed for developing practical agents and provides a foundation for research in temporally constrained AI systems, highlighting a path toward real-time capable agents. Car Moving While Agent Thinking Apples Timing Out While Agent Thinking Partners Acting While Agent Thinking tokens/step 1.0 Figure 1 | Upper: Three real-time games, Freeway, Snake, and Overcooked. Lower: Under cognitive load and time pressure, AgileThinker, engaging both reactive and planning reasoning, consistently outperforms agents that engage either of them. Scores are averaged across different games.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 800a3c6b-ff02-49a6-846c-db73502ee387Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem SolvingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2024 · 289 citations
- HAZARD Challenge: Embodied Decision Making in Dynamically Changing EnvironmentsQinhong Zhou, Sunli Chen, Yisong Wang, Haozhe Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 33 citations
- Leveraging Dual Process Theory in Language Agent Framework for Real-time Simultaneous Human-AI CollaborationShao Zhang, Xihuai Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Chaoran Li et al.ACL 2025 · 14 citations
- KORGym: A Dynamic Game Platform for LLM Reasoning EvaluationJiajun Shi, Jian Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Xingyuan Bu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
Related papers
- I-PHYRE: Interactive Physical ReasoningShiqian Li, Kewen Wu, Chi Zhang, Yixin ZhuICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Timely Machine: Awareness of Time Makes Test-Time Scaling AgenticYichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Yongkang Chen, Peiji Li et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Scalable Chain of Thoughts via Elastic ReasoningYuhui Xu, Hanze Dong, Lei Wang, Doyen Sahoo et al.ICLR 2026 · 42 citations
- TIC-VLA: A Think-in-Control Vision-Language-Action Model for Robot Navigation in Dynamic EnvironmentsZhiyu Huang, Yun Zhang, Johnson Liu, Rui Song et al.ICML 2026 · 11 citations
- When AI Agents Compete for Jobs: Strategic Capabilities and Economic Dynamics of AI Labour MarketsChris Chiu, Simpson Zhang, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2026
