A type system for extracting functional specifications from memory-safe imperative programs
Paul He, Eddy Westbrook, Brent Carmer, Chris Phifer, Valentin Robert, Karl Smeltzer, Andrei Stefanescu, Aaron Tomb, Adam Wick, Matthew Yacavone, Steve Zdancewic
Abstract
Verifying imperative programs is hard. A key difficulty is that the specification of what an imperative program does is often intertwined with details about pointers and imperative state. Although there are a number of powerful separation logics that allow the details of imperative state to be captured and managed, these details are complicated and reasoning about them requires significant time and expertise. In this paper, we take a different approach: a memory-safe type system that, as part of type-checking, extracts functional specifications from imperative programs. This disentangles imperative state, which is handled by the type system, from functional specifications, which can be verified without reference to pointers. A key difficulty is that sometimes memory safety depends crucially on the functional specification of a program; e.g., an array index is only memory-safe if the index is in bounds. To handle this case, our specification extraction inserts dynamic checks into the specification. Verification then requires the additional proof that none of these checks fail. However, these checks are in a purely functional language, and so this proof also requires no reasoning about pointers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f93d02c-2f23-4c43-b5f3-b5c30068a23bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- The future is ours: prophecy variables in separation logicRalf Jung, Rodolphe Lepigre, Gaurav Parthasarathy, Marianna Rapoport et al.POPL 2020 · 62 citations
- Igloo: soundly linking compositional refinement and separation logic for distributed system verificationChristoph Sprenger, Tobias Klenze, Marco Eilers, Felix A. Wolf et al.OOPSLA 2020 · 27 citations
- Verifying concurrent search structure templatesSiddharth Krishna, Nisarg Patel, Dennis E. Shasha, Thomas WiesPLDI 2020 · 19 citations
- Dijkstra monads forever: termination-sensitive specifications for interaction treesLucas Silver, Steve ZdancewicPOPL 2021 · 17 citations
- Distributed causal memory: modular specification and verification in higher-order distributed separation logicLéon Gondelman, Simon Oddershede Gregersen, Abel Nieto, Amin Timany et al.POPL 2021 · 17 citations
Related papers
- A Dependent Nominal Physical Type System for Static Analysis of Memory in Low Level CodeJulien Simonnet, Matthieu Lemerre, Mihaela SighireanuOOPSLA 2024 · 4 citations
- RefinedRust: A Type System for High-Assurance Verification of Rust ProgramsLennard Gäher, Michael Sammler, Ralf Jung, Robbert Krebbers et al.PLDI 2024 · 29 citations
- From Linearity to BorrowingAndrew Wagner, Olek Gierczak, Brianna Marshall, John M. Li et al.OOPSLA 2025 · 1 citation
- Compositional Non-Interference for Fine-Grained Concurrent ProgramsDan Frumin, Robbert Krebbers, Lars BirkedalS&P 2021 · 20 citations
- Arithmetizing Shape AnalysisSebastian Wolff, Ekanshdeep Gupta, Zafer Esen, Hossein Hojjat et al.CAV 2025
