From Linearity to Borrowing
Andrew Wagner, Olek Gierczak, Brianna Marshall, John M. Li, Amal Ahmed
Abstract
Linear type systems are powerful because they can statically ensure the correct management of resources like memory, but they can also be cumbersome to work with, since even benign uses of a resource require that it be explicitly threaded through during computation. Borrowing , as popularized by Rust, reduces this burden by allowing one to temporarily disable certain resource permissions (e.g., deallocation or mutation) in exchange for enabling certain structural permissions (e.g., weakening or contraction). In particular, this mechanism spares the borrower of a resource from having to explicitly return it to the lender but nevertheless ensures that the lender eventually reclaims ownership of the resource. In this paper, we elucidate the semantics of borrowing by starting with a standard linear type system for ensuring safe manual memory management in an untyped lambda calculus and gradually augmenting it with immutable borrows, lexical lifetimes, reborrowing, and finally mutable borrows. We prove semantic type soundness for our Borrow Calculus ( BoCa ) using Borrow Logic ( BoLo ), a novel domain-specific separation logic for borrowing. We establish the soundness of this logic using a semantic model that additionally guarantees that our calculus is terminating and free of memory leaks. We also show that our Borrow Logic is robust enough to establish the semantic safety of some syntactically ill-typed programs that temporarily break but reestablish invariants.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e787e76-595d-4ee5-b988-66fdd487175aCited by top-tier papers2
- Pure Borrow: Linear Haskell Meets Rust-Style BorrowingYusuke Matsushita, Hiromi IshiiPLDI 2026
- Rust’s Type Checker Implementation Is Unsound: An Empirical Study on Soundness Bugs in rustcYusung Sim, Sukyoung Ryu, Jaemin HongISSTA 2026
Builds on7
- Stacked borrows: an aliasing model for RustRalf Jung, Hoang-Hai Dang, Jeehoon Kang, Derek DreyerPOPL 2020 · 67 citations
- Perceus: garbage free reference counting with reuseAlex Reinking, Ningning Xie, Leonardo de Moura, Daan LeijenPLDI 2021 · 31 citations
- Deadlock-Free Separation Logic: Linearity Yields Progress for Dependent Higher-Order Message PassingJules Jacobs, Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2024 · 12 citations
- Tree BorrowsNeven Villani, Johannes Hostert, Derek Dreyer, Ralf JungPLDI 2025 · 8 citations
- Transfinite step-indexing for terminationSimon Spies, Neel Krishnaswami, Derek DreyerPOPL 2021 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Automatic Linear Resource Bound Analysis for Rust via Prophecy PotentialsQihao Lian, Di WangOOPSLA 2025 · 1 citation
- Verus: Verifying Rust Programs using Linear Ghost TypesAndrea Lattuada, Travis Hance, Chanhee Cho, Matthias Brun et al.OOPSLA 2023 · 86 citations
- Functional Ownership through Fractional UniquenessDanielle Marshall, Dominic OrchardOOPSLA 2024 · 6 citations
- Nola: Later-Free Ghost State for Verifying Termination in IrisYusuke Matsushita, Takeshi TsukadaPLDI 2025 · 2 citations
- RustHornBelt: a semantic foundation for functional verification of Rust programs with unsafe codeYusuke Matsushita, Xavier Denis, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Derek DreyerPLDI 2022 · 44 citations
