Reading Between the Prompts: How Stereotypes Shape LLM's Implicit Personalization
Vera Neplenbroek, Arianna Bisazza, Raquel Fernández
Abstract
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) infer user's demographic information from subtle cues in the conversation -a phenomenon called implicit personalization. Prior work has shown that such inferences can lead to lower quality responses for users assumed to be from minority groups, even when no demographic information is explicitly provided. In this work, we systematically explore how LLMs respond to stereotypical cues using controlled synthetic conversations, by analyzing the models' latent user representations through both model internals and generated answers to targeted user questions. Our findings reveal that LLMs do infer demographic attributes based on these stereotypical signals, which for a number of groups even persists when the user explicitly identifies with a different demographic group. Finally, we show that this form of stereotypedriven implicit personalization can be effectively mitigated by intervening on the model's internal representations using a trained linear probe to steer them toward the explicitly stated identity. Our results highlight the need for greater transparency and control in how LLMs represent user identity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f387174-1468-4590-bf92-9145ef5c5b13Cited by top-tier papers3
- Comparing human and LLM politeness strategies in free productionHaoran Zhao, Robert D. HawkinsEMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Identity-Robust Language Model Generation via Content Integrity PreservationMiao Zhang, Kelly Chen, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Rumi ChunaraACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Continuous Interpretive Steering for Scalar DiversityYe-eun ChoACL 2026
Builds on8
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language ModelsMyra Cheng, Esin Durmus, Dan JurafskyACL 2023 · 89 citations
- MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn DialoguesGe Bai, Jie Liu, Xingyuan Bu, Yancheng He et al.ACL 2024 · 35 citations
- Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM AgentsAdyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2024 · 30 citations
- CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language ModelsNikita Nangia, Clara Vania, Rasika Bhalerao, Samuel R. BowmanEMNLP 2020 · 19 citations
Related papers
- One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM PersonalizationFranziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner, Sebastian PadóACL 2026 · 4 citations
- Bias Runs Deep: Implicit Reasoning Biases in Persona-Assigned LLMsShashank Gupta, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Ameet Deshpande, Ashwin Kalyan et al.ICLR 2024 · 212 citations
- Artificial Impressions: Evaluating Large Language Model Behavior Through the Lens of Trait ImpressionsNicholas Deas, Kathleen McKeownEMNLP 2025
- Which Demographics do LLMs Default to During Annotation?Johannes Schäfer, Aidan Combs, Christopher Bagdon, Jiahui Li et al.ACL 2025 · 11 citations
- Who is better at math, Jenny or Jingzhen? Uncovering Stereotypes in Large Language ModelsZara Siddique, Liam D. Turner, Luis Espinosa AnkeEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
