Learning Progress Driven Multi-Agent Curriculum
Wenshuai Zhao, Zhiyuan Li, Joni Pajarinen
Abstract
The number of agents can be an effective curriculum variable for controlling the difficulty of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) tasks. Existing work typically uses manually defined curricula such as linear schemes. We identify two potential flaws while applying existing reward-based automatic curriculum learning methods in MARL: (1) The expected episode return used to measure task difficulty has high variance; (2) Credit assignment difficulty can be exacerbated in tasks where increasing the number of agents yields higher returns which is common in many MARL tasks. To address these issues, we propose to control the curriculum by using a TD-error based learning progress measure and by letting the curriculum proceed from an initial context distribution to the final task specific one. Since our approach maintains a distribution over the number of agents and measures learning progress rather than absolute performance, which often increases with the number of agents, we alleviate problem (2). Moreover, the learning progress measure naturally alleviates problem (1) by aggregating returns. In three challenging sparse-reward MARL benchmarks, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7f1abe35-d0b9-42de-9731-5daf8bf4f10cBuilds on7
- From Few to More: Large-Scale Dynamic Multiagent Curriculum LearningWeixun Wang, Tianpei Yang, Yong Liu, Jianye Hao et al.AAAI 2020 · 138 citations
- Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWei Fu, Chao Yu, Zelai Xu, Jiaqi Yang et al.ICML 2022 · 49 citations
- Variational Automatic Curriculum Learning for Sparse-Reward Cooperative Multi-Agent ProblemsJiayu Chen, Yuanxin Zhang, Yuanfan Xu, Huimin Ma et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
- Optimistic Multi-Agent Policy GradientWenshuai Zhao, Yi Zhao, Zhiyuan Li, Juho Kannala et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Improving Environment Novelty Quantification for Effective Unsupervised Environment DesignJayden Teoh, Wenjun Li, Pradeep VarakanthamNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
Related papers
- PORTAL: Automatic Curricula Generation for Multiagent Reinforcement LearningJizhou Wu, Jianye Hao, Tianpei Yang, Xiaotian Hao et al.AAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- Self-Paced Deep Reinforcement LearningPascal Klink, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters, Joni PajarinenNeurIPS 2020 · 83 citations
- Automated curriculum generation through setter-solver interactionsSébastien Racanière, Andrew K. Lampinen, Adam Santoro, David P. Reichert et al.ICLR 2020 · 41 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning via Constrained Optimal TransportPascal Klink, Haoyi Yang, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters et al.ICML 2022 · 44 citations
- Curriculum Reinforcement Learning using Optimal Transport via Gradual Domain AdaptationPeide Huang, Mengdi Xu, Jiacheng Zhu, Laixi Shi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 44 citations
