Certified but Fooled! Breaking Certified Defenses with Ghost Certificates
Viet Quoc Vo, Tashreque Mohammed Haq, Paul Montague, Tamas Abraham, Ehsan Abbasnejad, Damith C. Ranasinghe
Abstract
Certified defenses promise provable robustness guarantees. We study the malicious exploitation of probabilistic certification frameworks to better understand the limits of guarantee provisions. Now, the objective is to not only mislead a classifier, but also to manipulate the certification process to generate a robustness guarantee for an adversarial input—certificate spoofing. A recent study in ICLR demonstrated that crafting large perturbations can shift inputs far into regions capable of generating a certificate for an incorrect class. Our study investigates if perturbations are needed to cause a misclassification and yet coax a certified model into issuing a deceptive, large robustness radius for a target class can still be made small and imperceptible. We explore the idea of region-focused adversarial examples to craft imperceptible perturbations, spoof certificates and achieve certification radii larger than the source class—ghost certificates. Extensive evaluations with the ImageNet demonstrate the ability to effectively bypass state-of-the-art certified defenses such as Densepure. Our work underscores the need to better understand the limits of robustness certification methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7ea5116e-8de6-449e-8907-3f3388335997Builds on16
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
Related papers
- Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness CertificatesAmin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Tom GoldsteinICLR 2020 · 57 citations
- Higher-Order Certification For Randomized SmoothingJeet Mohapatra, Ching-Yun Ko, Tsui-Wei Weng, Pin-Yu Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 51 citations
- DensePure: Understanding Diffusion Models for Adversarial RobustnessChaowei Xiao, Zhongzhu Chen, Kun Jin, Jiongxiao Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 18 citations
- Certified Defense to Image Transformations via Randomized SmoothingMarc Fischer, Maximilian Baader, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2020 · 78 citations
- (De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch AttacksAlexander Levine, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2020 · 188 citations
