Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport
Igor Melnyk, Youssef Mroueh, Brian Belgodere, Mattia Rigotti, Apoorva Nitsure, Mikhail Yurochkin, Kristjan H. Greenewald, Jirí Navrátil, Jarret Ross
Abstract
Current LLM alignment techniques use pairwise human preferences at a sample level, and as such, they do not imply an alignment on the distributional level. We propose in this paper Alignment via Optimal Transport (AOT), a novel method for distributional preference alignment of LLMs. AOT aligns LLMs on unpaired preference data by making the reward distribution of the positive samples stochastically dominant in the first order on the distribution of negative samples. We introduce a convex relaxation of this first-order stochastic dominance and cast it as an optimal transport problem with a smooth and convex cost. Thanks to the one-dimensional nature of the resulting optimal transport problem and the convexity of the cost, it has a closed-form solution via sorting on empirical measures. We fine-tune LLMs with this AOT objective, which enables alignment by penalizing the violation of the stochastic dominance of the reward distribution of the positive samples on the reward distribution of the negative samples. We analyze the sample complexity of AOT by considering the dual of the OT problem and show that it converges at the parametric rate. Empirically, we show on a diverse set of alignment datasets and LLMs that AOT leads to state-of-the-art models in the 7B family of models when evaluated with Open LLM Benchmarks and AlpacaEval.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Language Model Fine-Tuning on Scaled Survey Data for Predicting Distributions of Public OpinionsJoseph Suh, Erfan Jahanparast, Suhong Moon, Minwoo Kang et al.ACL 2025 · 48 citations
- Stackelberg Self-Annotation: A Robust Approach to Data-Efficient LLM AlignmentChu Xu, Zhixin Zhang, Tianyu Jia, Yujie JinNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- DavIR: Data Selection via Implicit Reward for Large Language ModelsHaotian Zhou, Tingkai Liu, Qianli Ma, Yufeng Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 7 citations
- Unsupervised Federated Graph LearningLele Fu, Tianchi Liao, Sheng Huang, Bowen Deng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Hierarchical Refinement: Optimal Transport to Infinity and BeyondPeter Halmos, Julian Gold, Xinhao Liu, Benjamin J. RaphaelICML 2025
Builds on7
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Fast Differentiable Sorting and RankingMathieu Blondel, Olivier Teboul, Quentin Berthet, Josip DjolongaICML 2020 · 285 citations
- tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplesFelipe Maia Polo, Lucas Weber, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
Related papers
- AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy DistillationSongming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Tong Zhang, Bojie Hu et al.ACL 2025
- RoVRM: A Robust Visual Reward Model Optimized via Auxiliary Textual Preference DataChenglong Wang, Yang Gan, Yifu Huo, Yongyu Mu et al.AAAI 2025
- Direct Large Language Model Alignment Through Self-Rewarding Contrastive Prompt DistillationAiwei Liu, Haoping Bai, Zhiyun Lu, Xiang Kong et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
- Geometric-Averaged Preference Optimization for Soft Preference LabelsHiroki Furuta, Kuang-Huei Lee, Shixiang Shane Gu, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- Weak-to-Strong Preference Optimization: Stealing Reward from Weak Aligned ModelWenhong Zhu, Zhiwei He, Xiaofeng Wang, Pengfei Liu et al.ICLR 2025
