Sparse Linear Regression Is Easy on Random Supports
Gautam Chandrasekaran, Raghu Meka, Konstantinos Stavropoulos
Abstract
Sparse linear regression is one of the most basic questions in machine learning and statistics. Here, we are given as input a design matrix X ∈ R N ×d and measurements or labels y ∈ R N where y = Xw * + ξ, and ξ is the noise in the measurements. Importantly, we have the additional constraint that the unknown signal vector w * is sparse: it has k non-zero entries where k is much smaller than the ambient dimension. Our goal is to output a prediction vector w that has small prediction error: 1 N • ∥Xw * -X w∥ 2 2 . Information-theoretically, we know what is best possible in terms of measurements: under most natural noise distributions, we can get prediction error at most ϵ with roughly N = O(k log d/ϵ) samples. Computationally, this currently needs d Ω(k) run-time. Alternately, with N = O(d), we can get polynomialtime. Thus, there is an exponential gap (in the dependence on d) between the two and we do not know if it is possible to get d o(k) run-time and o(d) samples.
We give the first generic positive result for worst-case design matrices X: For any X, we show that if the support of w * is chosen at random, we can get prediction error ϵ with N = poly(k, log d, 1/ϵ) samples and run-time poly(d, N ). This run-time holds for any design matrix X with condition number up to 2 poly(d) .
Previously, such results were known for worst-case w * , but only for random design matrices from well-behaved families, matrices that have a very low condition number (poly(log d); e.g., as studied in compressed sensing), or those with special structural properties.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7e517cf2-a698-40d9-a8f4-3a95986bbd72Builds on4
- Learning Some Popular Gaussian Graphical Models without Condition Number BoundsJonathan A. Kelner, Frederic Koehler, Raghu Meka, Ankur MoitraNeurIPS 2020 · 38 citations
- Feature Adaptation for Sparse Linear RegressionJonathan A. Kelner, Frederic Koehler, Raghu Meka, Dhruv RohatgiNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Lower Bounds on Randomly Preconditioned Lasso via Robust Sparse DesignsJonathan A. Kelner, Frederic Koehler, Raghu Meka, Dhruv RohatgiNeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
- On the Power of Preconditioning in Sparse Linear RegressionJonathan A. Kelner, Frederic Koehler, Raghu Meka, Dhruv RohatgiFOCS 2021 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Exact Recovery of Sparse Binary Vectors from Generalized Linear MeasurementsArya Mazumdar, Neha SangwanICML 2025
- The Price of Sparsity: Sufficient Conditions for Sparse Recovery using Sparse and Sparsified MeasurementsYoussef Chaabouni, David GamarnikNeurIPS 2025
- Testing noisy linear functions for sparsityXue Chen, Anindya De, Rocco A. ServedioSTOC 2020 · 1 citation
- Truncated Linear Regression in High DimensionsConstantinos Daskalakis, Dhruv Rohatgi, Emmanouil ZampetakisNeurIPS 2020 · 19 citations
- Support Recovery of Sparse Signals from a Mixture of Linear MeasurementsSoumyabrata Pal, Arya Mazumdar, Venkata GandikotaNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
