Understanding Representation Learnability of Nonlinear Self-Supervised Learning
Ruofeng Yang, Xiangyuan Li, Bo Jiang, Shuai Li
Abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has empirically shown its data representation learnability in many downstream tasks. There are only a few theoretical works on data representation learnability, and many of those focus on final data representation, treating the nonlinear neural network as a ``black box". However, the accurate learning results of neural networks are crucial for describing the data distribution features learned by SSL models. Our paper is the first to analyze the learning results of the nonlinear SSL model accurately. We consider a toy data distribution that contains two features: the label-related feature and the hidden feature. Unlike previous linear setting work that depends on closed-form solutions, we use the gradient descent algorithm to train a 1-layer nonlinear SSL model with a certain initialization region and prove that the model converges to a local minimum. Furthermore, different from the complex iterative analysis, we propose a new analysis process which uses the exact version of Inverse Function Theorem to accurately describe the features learned by the local minimum. With this local minimum, we prove that the nonlinear SSL model can capture the label-related feature and hidden feature at the same time. In contrast, the nonlinear supervised learning (SL) model can only learn the label-related feature. We also present the learning processes and results of the nonlinear SSL and SL model via simulation experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7dc66ed0-0c01-429a-b104-0b0d51f5988cBuilds on15
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster AssignmentsMathilde Caron, Ishan Misra, Julien Mairal, Priya Goyal et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 5,249 citations
- Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised LearningLi Jing, Pascal Vincent, Yann LeCun, Yuandong TianICLR 2022 · 467 citations
Related papers
- Reverse Engineering Self-Supervised LearningIdo Ben-Shaul, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Tomer Galanti, Shai Dekel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
- Understanding the Role of Nonlinearity in Training Dynamics of Contrastive LearningYuandong TianICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- How unlabeled data improve generalization in self-training? A one-hidden-layer theoretical analysisShuai Zhang, Meng Wang, Sijia Liu, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2022 · 26 citations
- Can local learning match self-supervised backpropagation?Wu S. Zihan, Ariane Delrocq, Wulfram Gerstner, Guillaume BellecICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating ProcessRoland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma, Steffen Schneider, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2021 · 264 citations
