Plan-Answer-Refine-on-Graph: Structured Planning and Self-Refinement for Large Language Model Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs
Yuxin Shi, Han Fu, Zhuo Li, Chenghao Liu, Xiaoxue Ren, Jianling Sun
Abstract
Incorporating knowledge graphs (KGs) into large language model (LLM) reasoning has shown promise in alleviating hallucinations and factual errors. Although existing paradigms of KG-augmented LLMs have achieved encouraging results, they still exhibit notable limitations when handling multi-hop reasoning and complex logical queries: (1) search space truncation bias: current methods generate linear entity-relation reasoning paths, which can prune correct candidates prematurely during iterative exploration; and (2) entity error amplification: existing methods typically follow the retrieve-and-answer paradigm which causes LLMs to over-rely on retrieved evidence, exacerbating the impact of incorrect entities during reasoning. To alleviate the existing challenges, we propose Plan-Answer-Refine-on-Graph (PARoG), a novel framework for LLM reasoning on knowledge graphs. First, PARoG leverages SPARQL queries from KG data as references, decomposing them into structured step-by-step plans. We further train LLMs to construct such structured plans, which improves the logical consistency of reasoning, ensures uniform step granularity, and facilitates effective execution on the graph. Second, during reasoning over KGs, PARoG adopts a plan-answer-refine paradigm: the model first attempts to answer each sub-query independently, and then refines its prediction by integrating evidence retrieved from the KG. This process mitigates knowledge conflicts between LLM and KG, substantially reducing hallucinations. Experimental results on multiple KG reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PARoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving especially superior accuracy on multi-hop and logically complex queries. Our code is available at https://github.com/shiyuxin2000/PARoG
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7da92af5-7c3a-4fd9-96a0-52a35720d8b8Builds on35
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning YetJie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng et al.ICLR 2024 · 858 citations
Related papers
- Plan-on-Graph: Self-Correcting Adaptive Planning of Large Language Model on Knowledge GraphsLiyi Chen, Panrong Tong, Zhongming Jin, Ying Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 160 citations
- Paths-over-Graph: Knowledge Graph Empowered Large Language Model ReasoningXingyu Tan, Xiaoyang Wang, Qing Liu, Xiwei Xu et al.WWW 2025 · 86 citations
- ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge GraphsMinbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park et al.AAAI 2026
- VoG: Enhancing LLM Reasoning through Stepwise Verification on Knowledge GraphsWenxin Zhao, Jiachuan Wang, Yongqi Zhang, Shuangyin Li et al.ICLR 2026
- Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model ReasoningLinhao Luo, Yuan-Fang Li, Gholamreza Haffari, Shirui PanICLR 2024 · 499 citations
