ProgRAG: Hallucination-Resistant Progressive Retrieval and Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs
Minbae Park, Hyemin Yang, Jeonghyun Kim, Kunsoo Park, Hyunjoon Kim
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities but struggle with hallucinations and limited transparency. Recently, KG-enhanced LLMs that integrate knowledge graphs (KGs) have been shown to improve reasoning performance, particularly for complex, knowledgeintensive tasks. However, these methods still face significant challenges, including inaccurate retrieval and reasoning failures, often exacerbated by long input contexts that obscure relevant information or by context constructions that struggle to capture the richer logical directions required by different question types. Furthermore, many of these approaches rely on LLMs to directly retrieve evidence from KGs, and to selfassess the sufficiency of this evidence, which often results in premature or incorrect reasoning. To address the retrieval and reasoning failures, we propose ProgRAG, a multi-hop knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) framework that decomposes complex questions into sub-questions, and progressively extends partial reasoning paths by answering each subquestion. At each step, external retrievers gather candidate evidence, which is then refined through uncertainty-aware pruning by the LLM. Finally, the context for LLM reasoning is optimized by organizing and rearranging the partial reasoning paths obtained from the sub-question answers. Experiments on three well-known datasets demonstrate that ProgRAG outperforms existing baselines in multi-hop KGQA, offering improved reliability and reasoning quality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 65eacf0d-826b-4f36-b7c9-4ea5c5b7d680Builds on23
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language UnderstandingKaitao Song, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Jianfeng Lu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,957 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Plan-Answer-Refine-on-Graph: Structured Planning and Self-Refinement for Large Language Model Reasoning on Knowledge GraphsYuxin Shi, Han Fu, Zhuo Li, Chenghao Liu et al.ICLR 2026
- Paths-over-Graph: Knowledge Graph Empowered Large Language Model ReasoningXingyu Tan, Xiaoyang Wang, Qing Liu, Xiwei Xu et al.WWW 2025 · 86 citations
- Debate on Graph: A Flexible and Reliable Reasoning Framework for Large Language ModelsJie Ma, Zhitao Gao, Qi Chai, Wangchun Sun et al.AAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- EPERM: An Evidence Path Enhanced Reasoning Model for Knowledge Graph Question and AnsweringXiao Long, Liansheng Zhuang, Aodi Li, Minghong Yao et al.AAAI 2025 · 10 citations
- Empowering GraphRAG with Knowledge Filtering and IntegrationKai Guo, Harry Shomer, Shenglai Zeng, Haoyu Han et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
