From Unstructured Data to In-Context Learning: Exploring What Tasks Can Be Learned and When
Kevin Christian Wibisono, Yixin Wang
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) like transformers demonstrate impressive in-context learning (ICL) capabilities, allowing them to make predictions for new tasks based on prompt exemplars without parameter updates. While existing ICL theories often assume structured training data resembling ICL tasks (e.g., x-y pairs for linear regression), LLMs are typically trained unsupervised on unstructured text, such as web content, which lacks clear parallels to tasks like word analogy. To address this gap, we examine what enables ICL in models trained on unstructured data, focusing on critical sequence model requirements and training data structure. We find that many ICL capabilities can emerge simply from co-occurrence of semantically related word pairs in unstructured data; word analogy completion, for example, can provably arise purely through co-occurrence modeling, using classical language models like continuous bag of words (CBOW), without needing positional information or attention mechanisms. However, positional information becomes crucial for logic reasoning tasks requiring generalization to unseen tokens. Finally, we identify two cases where ICL fails: one in logic reasoning tasks that require generalizing to new, unseen patterns, and another in analogy completion where relevant word pairs appear only in fixed training positions. These findings suggest that LLMs' ICL abilities depend heavily on the structural elements within their training data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7d627f81-2f28-4991-9488-80ec7e2eedf7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on35
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
Related papers
- Parallel Structures in Pre-training Data Yield In-Context LearningYanda Chen, Chen Zhao, Zhou Yu, Kathleen R. McKeown et al.ACL 2024 · 1 citation
- Unlabeled Data Can Provably Enhance In-Context Learning of TransformersRenpu Liu, Jing YangNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Task Descriptors Help Transformers Learn Linear Models In-ContextRuomin Huang, Rong GeICLR 2025
- What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task HypothesisJiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan CotterellACL 2024 · 5 citations
- Provably Transformers Harness Multi-Concept Word Semantics for Efficient In-Context LearningDake Bu, Wei Huang, Andi Han, Atsushi Nitanda et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations
