PerMA-Bench: Benchmarking Persistent Memory Access
Lawrence Benson, Leon Papke, Tilmann Rabl
Abstract
Persistent memory's (PMem) byte-addressability and persistence at DRAM-like speed with SSD-like capacity have the potential to cause a major performance shift in database storage systems. With the availability of Intel Optane DC Persistent Memory, initial benchmarks evaluate the performance of real PMem hardware. However, these results apply to only a single server and it is not yet clear how workloads compare across different PMem servers. In this paper, we propose PerMA-Bench, a configurable benchmark framework that allows users to evaluate the bandwidth, latency, and operations per second for customizable database-related PMem access. Based on PerMA-Bench, we perform an extensive evaluation of PMem performance across four different server configurations, containing both first- and second-generation Optane, with additional parameters such as DIMM power budget and number of DIMMs per server. We validate our results with existing systems and show the impact of low-level design choices. We conduct a price-performance comparison that shows while there are large differences across Optane DIMMs, PMem is generally competitive with DRAM. We discuss our findings and identify eight general and implementation-specific aspects that influence PMem performance and should be considered in future work to improve PMem-aware designs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7d34e935-d4a6-4a17-a00e-3cd1d60f60bcCited by top-tier papers6
- SpecPMT: Speculative Logging for Resolving Crash Consistency Overhead of Persistent MemoryChencheng Ye, Yuanchao Xu, Xipeng Shen, Yan Sha et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 13 citations
- NVM: Is it Not Very Meaningful for Databases?Dimitrios Koutsoukos, Raghav Bhartia, Michal Friedman, Ana Klimovic et al.VLDB 2023 · 9 citations
- A Design Space Exploration and Evaluation for Main-Memory Hash Joins in Storage Class MemoryWentao Huang, Yunhong Ji, Xuan Zhou, Bingsheng He et al.VLDB 2023 · 9 citations
- Silo: Speculative Hardware Logging for Atomic Durability in Persistent MemoryMing Zhang, Yu HuaHPCA 2023 · 8 citations
- CXL Memory Performance for In-Memory Data ProcessingMarcel Weisgut, Daniel Ritter, Pinar Tözün, Lawrence Benson et al.VLDB 2025 · 7 citations
Builds on14
- An Empirical Guide to the Behavior and Use of Scalable Persistent MemoryJian Yang, Juno Kim, Morteza Hoseinzadeh, Joseph Izraelevitz et al.FAST 2020 · 470 citations
- FlatStore: An Efficient Log-Structured Key-Value Storage Engine for Persistent MemoryYoumin Chen, Youyou Lu, Fan Yang, Qing Wang et al.ASPLOS 2020 · 166 citations
- Lock-free Concurrent Level Hashing for Persistent MemoryZhangyu Chen, Yu Hua, Bo Ding, Pengfei ZuoUSENIX ATC 2020 · 98 citations
- Evaluating Persistent Memory Range IndexesLucas Lersch, Xiangpeng Hao, Ismail Oukid, Tianzheng Wang et al.VLDB 2020 · 97 citations
- Viper: An Efficient Hybrid PMem-DRAM Key-Value StoreLawrence Benson, Hendrik Makait, Tilmann RablVLDB 2021 · 86 citations
Related papers
- Evaluating Persistent Memory Range Indexes: Part TwoYuliang He, Duo Lu, Kaisong Huang, Tianzheng WangVLDB 2022 · 26 citations
- Understanding the Idiosyncrasies of Real Persistent MemoryShashank Gugnani, Arjun Kashyap, Xiaoyi LuVLDB 2021 · 67 citations
- Maximizing Persistent Memory Bandwidth Utilization for OLAP WorkloadsBjörn Daase, Lars Jonas Bollmeier, Lawrence Benson, Tilmann RablSIGMOD 2021 · 38 citations
- Cost Modelling for Optimal Data Placement in Heterogeneous Main MemoryRobert Lasch, Thomas Legler, Norman May, Bernhard Scheirle et al.VLDB 2022 · 12 citations
- Persistent Memory Hash Indexes: An Experimental EvaluationDaokun Hu, Zhiwen Chen, Jianbing Wu, Jianhua Sun et al.VLDB 2021 · 47 citations
