Maximizing Persistent Memory Bandwidth Utilization for OLAP Workloads
Björn Daase, Lars Jonas Bollmeier, Lawrence Benson, Tilmann Rabl
Abstract
Modern database systems for online analytical processing (OLAP) typically rely on in-memory processing. Keeping all active data in DRAM severely limits the data capacity and makes larger deployments much more expensive than disk-based alternatives. Byte-addressable persistent memory (PMEM) is an emerging storage technology that bridges the gap between slow-but-cheap SSDs and fast-but-expensive DRAM. Thus, research and industry have identified it as a promising alternative to pure in-memory data warehouses. However, recent work shows that PMEM's performance is strongly dependent on access patterns and does not always yield good results when simply treated like DRAM. To characterize PMEM's behavior in OLAP workloads, we systematically evaluate PMEM on a large, multi-socket server commonly used for OLAP workloads. Our evaluation shows that PMEM can be treated like DRAM for most read access but must be used differently when writing. To support our findings, we run the Star Schema Benchmark on PMEM and DRAM. We show that PMEM is suitable for large, read-heavy OLAP workloads with an average query runtime slowdown of 1.66x compared to DRAM. Following our evaluation, we present 7 best practices on how to maximize PMEM's bandwidth utilization in future system designs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers17
- Viper: An Efficient Hybrid PMem-DRAM Key-Value StoreLawrence Benson, Hendrik Makait, Tilmann RablVLDB 2021 · 86 citations
- ListDB: Union of Write-Ahead Logs and Persistent SkipLists for Incremental Checkpointing on Persistent MemoryWonbae Kim, Chanyeol Park, Dongui Kim, Hyeongjun Park et al.OSDI 2022 · 47 citations
- Nap: A Black-Box Approach to NUMA-Aware Persistent Memory IndexesQing Wang, Youyou Lu, Junru Li, Jiwu ShuOSDI 2021 · 46 citations
- PLIN: A Persistent Learned Index for Non-Volatile Memory with High Performance and Instant RecoveryZhou Zhang, Zhaole Chu, Peiquan Jin, Yongping Luo et al.VLDB 2023 · 39 citations
- ODINFS: Scaling PM Performance with Opportunistic DelegationDiyu Zhou, Yuchen Qian, Vishal Gupta, Zhifei Yang et al.OSDI 2022 · 29 citations
Builds on7
- An Empirical Guide to the Behavior and Use of Scalable Persistent MemoryJian Yang, Juno Kim, Morteza Hoseinzadeh, Joseph Izraelevitz et al.FAST 2020 · 470 citations
- FlatStore: An Efficient Log-Structured Key-Value Storage Engine for Persistent MemoryYoumin Chen, Youyou Lu, Fan Yang, Qing Wang et al.ASPLOS 2020 · 166 citations
- Evaluating Persistent Memory Range IndexesLucas Lersch, Xiangpeng Hao, Ismail Oukid, Tianzheng Wang et al.VLDB 2020 · 97 citations
- Quantifying TPC-H Choke Points and Their OptimizationsMarkus Dreseler, Martin Boissier, Tilmann Rabl, Matthias UflackerVLDB 2020 · 91 citations
- Understanding the Idiosyncrasies of Real Persistent MemoryShashank Gugnani, Arjun Kashyap, Xiaoyi LuVLDB 2021 · 67 citations
Related papers
- Cost Modelling for Optimal Data Placement in Heterogeneous Main MemoryRobert Lasch, Thomas Legler, Norman May, Bernhard Scheirle et al.VLDB 2022 · 12 citations
- PerMA-Bench: Benchmarking Persistent Memory AccessLawrence Benson, Leon Papke, Tilmann RablVLDB 2022 · 19 citations
- NVM: Is it Not Very Meaningful for Databases?Dimitrios Koutsoukos, Raghav Bhartia, Michal Friedman, Ana Klimovic et al.VLDB 2023 · 9 citations
- Taking Analytic Databases to the BankAlexandar Devic, Martin Prammer, Kevin P. Gaffney, Siddhartha Balakrishna Rai et al.ISCA 2026
- P-Massive: A Real-Time Search Engine for a Multi-Terabyte Mass Spectrometry DatabaseNarangerelt Batsoyol, Benjamin S. Pullman, Mingxun Wang, Nuno Bandeira et al.SC 2022 · 17 citations
