Short circuit walks in fixed dimension
Alexander E. Black, Christian Nöbel, Raphael Steiner
Abstract
Circuit augmentation schemes are a family of combinatorial algorithms for linear programming that generalize the simplex method. To solve the linear program, they construct a so-called monotone circuit walk : They start at an initial vertex of the feasible region and traverse a discrete sequence of points on the boundary, while moving along certain allowed directions (circuits) and improving the objective function at each step until reaching an optimum. Since the existence of short circuit walks has been conjectured (Circuit Diameter Conjecture), several works have investigated how well one can efficiently approximate shortest monotone circuit walks towards an optimum. A first result addressing this question was given by De Loera, Kafer, and Sanità [SIAM J. Opt., 2022], who showed that given as input an LP and the starting vertex, finding a 2-approximation for this problem is NP-hard. Cardinal and the third author [Math. Prog. 2023] gave a stronger lower bound assuming the exponential time hypothesis, showing that even an approximation factor of O( log m log log m ) is intractable for LPs defined by m inequalities. Both of these results were based on reductions from highly degenerate polytopes in combinatorial optimization with high dimension.
In this paper, we significantly strengthen the aforementioned hardness results by showing that for every fixed ε > 0 approximating the problem on polygons with m edges to within a factor of O(m 1-ε ) is NP-hard. This result is essentially best-possible, as it cannot be improved beyond o(m). In particular, this implies hardness for simple polytopes and in fixed dimension.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7d124972-1b8d-40c1-a1a3-a0b7816e8d20Builds on5
- No self-concordant barrier interior point method is strongly polynomialXavier Allamigeon, Stéphane Gaubert, Nicolas VandameSTOC 2022 · 8 citations
- Interior point methods are not worse than SimplexXavier Allamigeon, Daniel Dadush, Georg Loho, Bento Natura et al.FOCS 2022 · 8 citations
- A Strongly Polynomial Algorithm for Linear Programs with At Most Two Nonzero Entries per Row or ColumnDaniel Dadush, Zhuan Khye Koh, Bento Natura, Neil Olver et al.STOC 2024 · 3 citations
- Complexity of polytope diameters via perfect matchingsChristian Nöbel, Raphael SteinerSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- Computing the Polytope Diameter is Even Harder than NP-hard (Already for Perfect Matchings)Lasse WulfFOCS 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Small Shadows of Lattice PolytopesAlexander E. BlackSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Near Optimal Alphabet-Soundness Tradeoff PCPsDor Minzer, Kai Zhe ZhengSTOC 2024 · 3 citations
- Hardness of Approximation for Shortest Path with Vector CostsCharlie Carlson, Yury Makarychev, Ron MosenzonSODA 2026
- A scaling-invariant algorithm for linear programming whose running time depends only on the constraint matrixDaniel Dadush, Sophie Huiberts, Bento Natura, László A. VéghSTOC 2020 · 17 citations
- A PTAS for ℓ0-Low Rank Approximation: Solving Dense CSPs over RealsVincent Cohen-Addad, Chenglin Fan, Suprovat Ghoshal, Euiwoong Lee et al.SODA 2024
