DevOps-Gym: Benchmarking AI Agents in Software DevOps Cycle
Yuheng Tang, Kaijie Zhu, Bonan Ruan, Chuqi Zhang, Michael Yang, Hongwei Li, Suyue Guo, Tianneng Shi, Zekun Li, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni Vigna, Dawn Song
Abstract
Even though demonstrating extraordinary capabilities in code generation and software issue resolving, AI agents' capabilities in the full software DevOps cycle are still unknown. Different from pure code generation, handling the DevOps cycle in real-world software, including developing, deploying, and managing, requires analyzing large-scale projects, understanding dynamic program behaviors, leveraging domain-specific tools, and making sequential decisions. However, existing benchmarks focus on isolated problems and lack environments and tool interfaces for DevOps. We introduce DEVOPS-GYM, the first end-to-end benchmark for evaluating AI agents across core DevOps workflows: build and configuration, monitoring, issue resolving, and test generation, plus end-to-end pipeline tasks that require solving problems across all stages sequentially. DEVOPS-GYM includes 700+ real-world tasks collected from 30+ projects in Java and Go. We develop a semi-automated data collection mechanism with rigorous and non-trivial expert efforts in ensuring the task coverage and quality. Our evaluation of stateof-the-art models and agents reveals fundamental limitations: they struggle with issue resolving and test generation in Java and Go, and remain unable to handle new tasks such as monitoring and build and configuration. These results highlight the need for essential research in automating the full DevOps cycle with AI agents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software EngineeringJohn Yang, Carlos E. Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2,059 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion SystemsTianyang Liu, Canwen Xu, Julian J. McAuleyICLR 2024 · 338 citations
Related papers
- CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity CapabilitiesTianneng Shi, Robin Rheem, Dongwei Jiang, Mona Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- TritonGym: A Benchmark for Agentic LLM Workflows in Triton GPU Code GenerationYue Guan, Yichen Lin, Xu Zhao, Jianzhu Yao et al.ICML 2026
- CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at ScaleZhun Wang, Tianneng Shi, Jingxuan He, Matthew Cai et al.ICLR 2026 · 83 citations
- EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise SettingsShiva Malay, Perampalli Shravan Nayak, Sagar Davasam, Srinivas Sunkara et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- WorkArena: How Capable are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?Alexandre Drouin, Maxime Gasse, Massimo Caccia, Issam H. Laradji et al.ICML 2024 · 188 citations
