EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise Settings
Shiva Malay, Perampalli Shravan Nayak, Sagar Davasam, Srinivas Sunkara, Sai Rajeswar Mudumba
Abstract
Large language models are shifting from passive information providers to active agents intended for complex workflows. However, their deployment as reliable AI workers in enterprise is stalled by benchmarks that fail to capture the intricacies of professional environments, specifically, the need for long-horizon planning amidst persistent state changes and strict access protocols. In this work, we introduce ENTERPRISEOPS-GYM, a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic planning in realistic enterprise settings. Specifically, ENTERPRISEOPS-GYM features a containerized sandbox with 164 database tables and 512 functional tools to mimic real-world search friction. Within this environment, agents are evaluated on 1,150 expert-curated tasks across eight missioncritical verticals (including Customer Service, HR, and IT). Our evaluation of 14 frontier models reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models: the top-performing Claude Opus 4.5 achieves only 37.4% success. Further analysis shows that providing oracle human plans improves performance by 14-35 percentage points, pinpointing strategic reasoning as the primary bottleneck. Additionally, agents frequently fail to refuse infeasible tasks (best model achieves 53.9%), leading to unintended and potentially harmful side effects. Our findings underscore that current agents are not yet ready for autonomous enterprise deployment. More broadly, ENTERPRISEOPS-GYM provides a concrete testbed to advance the robustness of agentic planning in professional workflows. https://enterpriseops-gym.github.io
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMsMinghao Li, Yingxiu Zhao, Bowen Yu, Feifan Song et al.EMNLP 2023 · 72 citations
- UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and InteractionShravan Nayak, Xiangru Jian, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Juan A. Rodríguez et al.ICML 2025
- Can LLMs Help You at Work? A Sandbox for Evaluating LLM Agents in Enterprise EnvironmentsHarsh Vishwakarma, Ankush Agarwal, Ojas Patil, Chaitanya Devaguptapu et al.EMNLP 2025
- Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at ScaleRogerio Bonatti, Dan Zhao, Francesco Bonacci, Dillon Dupont et al.ICML 2025
Related papers
- AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World ContextsKeyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang et al.ACL 2026 · 14 citations
- WorkArena: How Capable are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?Alexandre Drouin, Maxime Gasse, Massimo Caccia, Issam H. Laradji et al.ICML 2024 · 188 citations
- FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature DevelopmentQixing Zhou, Jiacheng Zhang, Haiyang Wang, Rui Hao et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- OrchestrationBench: LLM-Driven Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Multi-Domain ScenariosAelim Ahn, Sooyeon Lee, Hyosun Wang, Chiwan Park et al.ICLR 2026
- InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative AI ResearchYunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Weiye Si, Zhen Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
