Intriguing Properties of Input-Dependent Randomized Smoothing
Peter Súkeník, Aleksei Kuvshinov, Stephan Günnemann
Abstract
Randomized smoothing is currently considered the state-of-the-art method to obtain certifiably robust classifiers. Despite its remarkable performance, the method is associated with various serious problems such as"certified accuracy waterfalls", certification vs. accuracy trade-off, or even fairness issues. Input-dependent smoothing approaches have been proposed with intention of overcoming these flaws. However, we demonstrate that these methods lack formal guarantees and so the resulting certificates are not justified. We show that in general, the input-dependent smoothing suffers from the curse of dimensionality, forcing the variance function to have low semi-elasticity. On the other hand, we provide a theoretical and practical framework that enables the usage of input-dependent smoothing even in the presence of the curse of dimensionality, under strict restrictions. We present one concrete design of the smoothing variance function and test it on CIFAR10 and MNIST. Our design mitigates some of the problems of classical smoothing and is formally underlined, yet further improvement of the design is still necessary.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Prompt Certified Machine Unlearning with Randomized Gradient Smoothing and QuantizationZijie Zhang, Yang Zhou, Xin Zhao, Tianshi Che et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 56 citations
- Double Sampling Randomized SmoothingLinyi Li, Jiawei Zhang, Tao Xie, Bo LiICML 2022 · 29 citations
- Mitigating the Curse of Dimensionality for Certified Robustness via Dual Randomized SmoothingSong Xia, Yi Yu, Xudong Jiang, Henghui DingICLR 2024 · 18 citations
- Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certified Adversarial Robustness for Multi-Step DefencesSaiyue Lyu, Shadab Shaikh, Frederick Shpilevskiy, Evan Shelhamer et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Multi-scale Diffusion Denoised SmoothingJongheon Jeong, Jinwoo ShinNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
Builds on5
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and SizesGreg Yang, Tony Duan, J. Edward Hu, Hadi Salman et al.ICML 2020 · 237 citations
- Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example DifficultyRobert J. N. Baldock, Hartmut Maennel, Behnam NeyshaburNeurIPS 2021 · 204 citations
- Curse of Dimensionality on Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable RobustnessAounon Kumar, Alexander Levine, Tom Goldstein, Soheil FeiziICML 2020 · 102 citations
- Higher-Order Certification For Randomized SmoothingJeet Mohapatra, Ching-Yun Ko, Tsui-Wei Weng, Pin-Yu Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Dual Randomized Smoothing: Beyond Global Noise VarianceChenhao Sun, Yuhao Mao, Martin VechevICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized SmoothingBlaise Delattre, Alexandre Araujo, Quentin Barthélemy, Alexandre AllauzenICLR 2024 · 7 citations
- Improving l1-Certified Robustness via Randomized Smoothing by Leveraging Box ConstraintsVáclav Vorácek, Matthias HeinICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Average Certified Radius is a Poor Metric for Randomized SmoothingChenhao Sun, Yuhao Mao, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. VechevICML 2025
- Confidence-Aware Training of Smoothed Classifiers for Certified RobustnessJongheon Jeong, Seojin Kim, Jinwoo ShinAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
