Learning from Aggregate responses: Instance Level versus Bag Level Loss Functions
Adel Javanmard, Lin Chen, Vahab Mirrokni, Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Gang Fu
Abstract
Due to the rise of privacy concerns, in many practical applications the training data is aggregated before being shared with the learner, in order to protect privacy of users' sensitive responses. In an aggregate learning framework, the dataset is grouped into bags of samples, where each bag is available only with an aggregate response, providing a summary of individuals' responses in that bag. In this paper, we study two natural loss functions for learning from aggregate responses: bag-level loss and the instance-level loss. In the former, the model is learnt by minimizing a loss between aggregate responses and aggregate model predictions, while in the latter the model aims to fit individual predictions to the aggregate responses. In this work, we show that the instance-level loss can be perceived as a regularized form of the bag-level loss. This observation lets us compare the two approaches with respect to bias and variance of the resulting estimators, and introduce a novel interpolating estimator which combines the two approaches. For linear regression tasks, we provide a precise characterization of the risk of the interpolating estimator in an asymptotic regime where the size of the training set grows in proportion to the features dimension. Our analysis allows us to theoretically understand the effect of different factors, such as bag size on the model prediction risk. In addition, we propose a mechanism for differentially private learning from aggregate responses and derive the optimal bag size in terms of prediction risk-privacy trade-off. We also carry out thorough experiments to corroborate our theory and show the efficacy of the interpolating estimator.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b853614-09ff-475d-b14c-cab88b2cc409Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Learning from Aggregate ObservationsYivan Zhang, Nontawat Charoenphakdee, Zhenguo Wu, Masashi SugiyamaNeurIPS 2020 · 36 citations
- Easy Learning from Label ProportionsRóbert Busa-Fekete, Heejin Choi, Travis Dick, Claudio Gentile et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Learnability of Linear Thresholds from Label ProportionsRishi SaketNeurIPS 2021 · 19 citations
- Learning from Label Proportions: A Mutual Contamination FrameworkClayton Scott, Jianxin ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 12 citations
Related papers
- A Universal Unbiased Method for Classification from Aggregate ObservationsZixi Wei, Lei Feng, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 7 citations
- Label differential privacy and private training data releaseRóbert Istvan Busa-Fekete, Andrés Muñoz Medina, Umar Syed, Sergei VassilvitskiiICML 2023 · 9 citations
- Smoothly Bounding User Contributions in Differential PrivacyAlessandro Epasto, Mohammad Mahdian, Jieming Mao, Vahab S. Mirrokni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 17 citations
- The Value of Collaboration in Convex Machine Learning with Differential PrivacyNan Wu, Farhad Farokhi, David B. Smith, Mohamed Ali KâafarS&P 2020 · 112 citations
- Learning from Label Proportions: Bootstrapping Supervised Learners via Belief PropagationShreyas Havaldar, Navodita Sharma, Shubhi Sareen, Karthikeyan Shanmugam et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
