The Value of Collaboration in Convex Machine Learning with Differential Privacy
Nan Wu, Farhad Farokhi, David B. Smith, Mohamed Ali Kâafar
Abstract
In this paper, we apply machine learning to distributed private data owned by multiple data owners, entities with access to non-overlapping training datasets. We use noisy, differentially-private gradients to minimize the fitness cost of the machine learning model using stochastic gradient descent. We quantify the quality of the trained model, using the fitness cost, as a function of privacy budget and size of the distributed datasets to capture the trade-off between privacy and utility in machine learning. This way, we can predict the outcome of collaboration among privacy-aware data owners prior to executing potentially computationally-expensive machine learning algorithms. Particularly, we show that the difference between the fitness of the trained machine learning model using differentially-private gradient queries and the fitness of the trained machine model in the absence of any privacy concerns is inversely proportional to the size of the training datasets squared and the privacy budget squared. We successfully validate the performance prediction with the actual performance of the proposed privacy-aware learning algorithms, applied to: financial datasets for determining interest rates of loans using regression; and detecting credit card frauds using support vector machines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b7cbf83-b0f5-4e0e-87fa-375e4b279bd3Cited by top-tier papers9
- Improving LoRA in Privacy-preserving Federated LearningYoubang Sun, Zitao Li, Yaliang Li, Bolin DingICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- Federated Matrix Factorization with Privacy GuaranteeZitao Li, Bolin Ding, Ce Zhang, Ninghui Li et al.VLDB 2022 · 50 citations
- Differentially Private Vertical Federated ClusteringZitao Li, Tianhao Wang, Ninghui LiVLDB 2023 · 26 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- FedSVD: Adaptive Orthogonalization for Private Federated Learning with LoRASeanie Lee, Sangwoo Park, Dong Bok Lee, Dominik Wagner et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
Builds on2
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Budgeting for Growing Machine Learning DatasetsWeiting Li, Liyao Xiang, Zhou Zhou, Feng PengINFOCOM 2021 · 14 citations
- Differentially Private Federated Learning with Time-Adaptive Privacy SpendingShahrzad Kiani, Nupur Kulkarni, Adam Dziedzic, Stark C. Draper et al.ICLR 2025
- Have it your way: Individualized Privacy Assignment for DP-SGDFranziska Boenisch, Christopher Mühl, Adam Dziedzic, Roy Rinberg et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 39 citations
- Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated LearningAlberto Bietti, Chen-Yu Wei, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford et al.ICML 2022 · 67 citations
- Towards Learning on Vertically Partitioned Data with Distributed Differential PrivacyErgute Bao, Fei Wei, Yin Yang, Xiaokui Xiao et al.ICDE 2025 · 1 citation
