Fair Personalized Learner Modeling Without Sensitive Attributes
Hefei Xu, Min Hou, Le Wu, Fei Liu, Yonghui Yang, Haoyue Bai, Richang Hong, Meng Wang
Abstract
Personalized learner modeling uses learners' historical behavior data to diagnose their cognitive abilities, a process known as Cognitive Diagnosis (CD). This is essential for web-based learning services such as learning resource recommendation and adaptive testing. However, prior studies have shown that CD models may unfairly correlate learners' abilities with sensitive attributes (e.g., gender, region), leading to biased outcomes. While existing approaches mitigate this issue by decorrelating sensitive attributes from the modeling process, privacy concerns make collecting such attributes impractical. Furthermore, the presence of multiple sensitive attributes complicates fairness improvements. In this paper, we explore how to achieve fair personalized learner modeling without relying on any sensitive attribute input. We introduce a novel fairness objective tailored for personalized learner modeling and design a max-min strategy to facilitate both sensitive information inference and fair CD modeling. In the max step, we infer pseudo-labels by maximizing the fairness objective, while in the min step, we retrain the CD model by minimizing it. Additionally, we provide a theoretical guarantee that our framework reduces the upper bound of fairness generalization error. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms existing methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/HeFei-X/FairWISA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7b4f2828-e1ee-4038-b09e-6cc335afaa70Cited by top-tier papers2
- Mitigating Distribution Shifts in Sequential Recommendation: An Invariance PerspectiveYuxin Liao, Yonghui Yang, Min Hou, Le Wu et al.SIGIR 2025 · 6 citations
- RMBRec: Robust Multi-Behavior Recommendation towards Target BehaviorsMiaomiao Cai, Zhijie Zhang, Junfeng Fang, Zhiyong Cheng et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on24
- Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group InformationEvan Zheran Liu, Behzad Haghgoo, Annie S. Chen, Aditi Raghunathan et al.ICML 2021 · 683 citations
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 454 citations
- Learning from Failure: De-biasing Classifier from Biased ClassifierJun Hyun Nam, Hyuntak Cha, Sungsoo Ahn, Jaeho Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 428 citations
- Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted LearningPreethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 406 citations
- Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education SystemsFei Wang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Zhenya Huang et al.AAAI 2020 · 329 citations
Related papers
- FairLISA: Fair User Modeling with Limited Sensitive Attributes InformationZheng Zhang, Qi Liu, Hao Jiang, Fei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 42 citations
- Path-Specific Causal Reasoning for Fairness-aware Cognitive DiagnosisDacao Zhang, Kun Zhang, Le Wu, Mi Tian et al.KDD 2024 · 10 citations
- Rényi Fair InferenceSina Baharlouei, Maher Nouiehed, Ahmad Beirami, Meisam RazaviyaynICLR 2020 · 69 citations
- Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive ParadigmJiatong Li, Qi Liu, Fei Wang, Jiayu Liu et al.WWW 2024 · 21 citations
- Rethinking Learner Modeling: A Feedback-Centric Cognitive Disentanglement PerspectiveXiaoshan Yu, Shangshang Yang, Jian Li, Ziwen Wang et al.KDD 2025
