Towards Automating Data Access Permissions in AI Agents
Yuhao Wu, Ke Yang, Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno, Ning Zhang, Umar Iqbal
Abstract
As AI agents attempt to autonomously act on users' behalf, they raise transparency and control issues. We argue that permission-based access control is indispensable in providing meaningful control to the users, but conventional permission models are inadequate for the automated agentic execution paradigm. We therefore propose automated permission management for AI agents. Our key idea is to conduct a user study to identify the factors influencing users' permission decisions and to encode these factors into an ML-based permission management assistant capable of predicting users' future decisions. We find that participants' permission decisions are influenced by communication context but importantly individual preferences tend to remain consistent within contexts, and align with those of other participants. Leveraging these insights, we develop a permission prediction model achieving 85.1% accuracy overall and 94.4% for high-confidence predictions. We find that even without using permission history, our model achieves an accuracy of 66.9%, and a slight increase of training samples (i.e., can substantially increase the accuracy by 10.8%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7ab10d07-ebee-47c7-9242-78935fadb839Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 4,448 citations
- Online Tracking: A 1-million-site Measurement and AnalysisSteven Englehardt, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 798 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT PlatformsYunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati et al.NDSS 2017 · 325 citations
Related papers
- Decide Yourself or Delegate - User Preferences Regarding the Autonomy of Personal Privacy Assistants in Private IoT-Equipped EnvironmentsKarola Marky, Alina Stöver, Sarah Prange, Kira Bleck et al.CHI 2024 · 12 citations
- Exploring the Design Space of User-System Communication for Smart-home Routine AssistantsYi-Shyuan Chiang, Ruei-Che Chang, Yi-Lin Chuang, Shih-Ya Chou et al.CHI 2020 · 35 citations
- The Feasibility of Dynamically Granted Permissions: Aligning Mobile Privacy with User PreferencesPrimal Wijesekera, Arjun Baokar, Lynn Tsai, Joel Reardon et al.S&P 2017 · 156 citations
- Does My Chatbot Have an Agenda? Understanding Human and AI Agency in Human-Human-like Chatbot InteractionBhada Yun, Evgenia Taranova, April Yi WangCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI AgentsChristoph Bühler, Matteo Biagiola, Luca Di Grazia, Guido SalvaneschiFSE 2026 · 1 citation
