On the Sample Complexity of Adversarial Multi-Source PAC Learning
Nikola Konstantinov, Elias Frantar, Dan Alistarh, Christoph Lampert
Abstract
We study the problem of learning from multiple untrusted data sources, a scenario of increasing practical relevance given the recent emergence of crowdsourcing and collaborative learning paradigms. Specifically, we analyze the situation in which a learning system obtains datasets from multiple sources, some of which might be biased or even adversarially perturbed. It is known that in the single-source case, an adversary with the power to corrupt a fixed fraction of the training data can prevent PAC-learnability, that is, even in the limit of infinitely much training data, no learning system can approach the optimal test error. In this work we show that, surprisingly, the same is not true in the multi-source setting, where the adversary can arbitrarily corrupt a fixed fraction of the data sources. Our main results are a generalization bound that provides finite-sample guarantees for this learning setting, as well as corresponding lower bounds. Besides establishing PAC-learnability our results also show that in a cooperative learning setting sharing data with other parties has provable benefits, even if some participants are malicious.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- An Equivalence Between Data Poisoning and Byzantine Gradient AttacksSadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Lê Nguyên Hoang, Oscar VillemaudICML 2022 · 30 citations
- Incentivizing Honesty among Competitors in Collaborative Learning and OptimizationFlorian E. Dorner, Nikola Konstantinov, Georgi Pashaliev, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2023 · 18 citations
- Robust Density Estimation from Batches: The Best Things in Life are (Nearly) FreeAyush Jain, Alon OrlitskyICML 2021 · 10 citations
- Understanding Server-Assisted Federated Learning in the Presence of Incomplete Client ParticipationHaibo Yang, Peiwen Qiu, Prashant Khanduri, Minghong Fang et al.ICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Towards the Theory of Unsupervised Federated Learning: Non-asymptotic Analysis of Federated EM AlgorithmsYe Tian, Haolei Weng, Yang FengICML 2024 · 7 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Robust and Actively Secure Serverless Collaborative LearningNicholas Franzese, Adam Dziedzic, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Mark R. Thomas et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- Trade-offs and Guarantees of Adversarial Representation Learning for Information ObfuscationHan Zhao, Jianfeng Chi, Yuan Tian, Geoffrey J. GordonNeurIPS 2020 · 29 citations
- Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling FunctionsYuyang Deng, Mingda QiaoICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Fast Rate Bounds for Multi-Task and Meta-Learning with Different Sample SizesHossein Zakerinia, Christoph H. LampertNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Derandomizing Multi-Distribution LearningKasper Green Larsen, Omar Montasser, Nikita ZhivotovskiyNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
