Understanding Server-Assisted Federated Learning in the Presence of Incomplete Client Participation
Haibo Yang, Peiwen Qiu, Prashant Khanduri, Minghong Fang, Jia Liu
Abstract
Existing works in federated learning (FL) often assume an ideal system with either full client or uniformly distributed client participation. However, in practice, it has been observed that some clients may never participate in FL training (aka incomplete client participation) due to a myriad of system heterogeneity factors. A popular approach to mitigate impacts of incomplete client participation is the server-assisted federated learning (SA-FL) framework, where the server is equipped with an auxiliary dataset. However, despite SA-FL has been empirically shown to be effective in addressing the incomplete client participation problem, there remains a lack of theoretical understanding for SA-FL. Meanwhile, the ramifications of incomplete client participation in conventional FL are also poorly understood. These theoretical gaps motivate us to rigorously investigate SA-FL. Toward this end, we first show that conventional FL is not PAC-learnable under incomplete client participation in the worst case. Then, we show that the PAC-learnability of FL with incomplete client participation can indeed be revived by SA-FL, which theoretically justifies the use of SA-FL for the first time. Lastly, to provide practical guidance for SA-FL training under incomplete client participation, we propose the (server-assisted federated averaging) algorithm that enjoys the same linear convergence speedup guarantees as classic FL with ideal client participation assumptions, offering the first SA-FL algorithm with convergence guarantee. Extensive experiments on different datasets show significantly improves the performance under incomplete client participation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- FedAU2: Attribute Unlearning for User-Level Federated Recommender Systems with Adaptive and Robust Adversarial TrainingYuyuan Li, Junjie Fang, Fengyuan Yu, Xichun Sheng et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- LoCoDL: Communication-Efficient Distributed Learning with Local Training and CompressionLaurent Condat, Arto Maranjyan, Peter RichtárikICLR 2025
Builds on21
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID DataXiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,930 citations
- Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated OptimizationJianyu Wang, Qinghua Liu, Hao Liang, Gauri Joshi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,231 citations
- Adaptive Federated OptimizationSashank J. Reddi, Zachary Charles, Manzil Zaheer, Zachary Garrett et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,917 citations
- No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID DataMi Luo, Fei Chen, Dapeng Hu, Yifan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 510 citations
Related papers
- A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client ParticipationShiqiang Wang, Mingyue JiNeurIPS 2022 · 85 citations
- Tackling System and Statistical Heterogeneity for Federated Learning with Adaptive Client SamplingBing Luo, Wenli Xiao, Shiqiang Wang, Jianwei Huang et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 224 citations
- Convergence Analysis of Split Federated Learning on Heterogeneous DataPengchao Han, Chao Huang, Geng Tian, Ming Tang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated LearningHaibo Yang, Minghong Fang, Jia LiuICLR 2021 · 310 citations
- Anarchic Federated LearningHaibo Yang, Xin Zhang, Prashant Khanduri, Jia LiuICML 2022 · 62 citations
