Lune

EMNLP Findings2024

Preference Tuning For Toxicity Mitigation Generalizes Across Languages

Xiaochen Li, Zheng Xin Yong, Stephen H. Bach

Abstract

Detoxifying multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) has become crucial due to their increasing global use. In this work, we explore zero-shot cross-lingual generalization of preference tuning in detoxifying LLMs. In contrast to prior work that suggests limited crosslingual generalization for other safety tasks, we show that Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training with only English data can significantly reduce toxicity in multilingual openended generations. For instance, the probability of mGPT-1.3B in generating toxic continuations drops from 46.8% to 3.9% across 17 different languages after training. Our results also generalize to other multilingual LLMs, such as BLOOM, Llama3, and Aya-23. Using mechanistic interpretability tools such as causal intervention and activation analysis, we have discovered the dual multilinguality property of MLP layers in LLMs, which explains the cross-lingual generalization of DPO. Finally, we show that bilingual sentence retrieval can be predictive of the cross-lingual transferability of DPO preference tuning.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 12 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers12

  1. Self-Jailbreaking: Language Models Can Reason Themselves Out of Safety Alignment After Benign Reasoning TrainingZheng Xin Yong, Stephen H. BachICLR 2026 · 10 citations
  2. Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMsShangpin Peng, Weinong Wang, Zhuotao Tian, Senqiao Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
  3. IF-Guide: Influence Function-Guided Detoxification of LLMsZachary Coalson, Juhan Bae, Nicholas Carlini, Sanghyun HongNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
  4. Does Refusal Training in LLMs Generalize to the Past Tense?Maksym Andriushchenko, Nicolas FlammarionICLR 2025 · 6 citations
  5. The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring The Language Gap To Mitigating ItZheng Xin Yong, Beyza Ermis, Marzieh Fadaee, Stephen H. Bach et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations

Builds on29

  1. Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
  2. Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
  3. QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
  4. The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
  5. Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations

Related papers

  1. How Does DPO Reduce Toxicity? A Mechanistic Neuron-Level AnalysisYushi Yang, Filip Sondej, Harry Mayne, Andrew Lee et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
  2. TUBA: Cross-Lingual Transferability of Backdoor Attacks in LLMs with Instruction TuningXuanli He, Jun Wang, Qiongkai Xu, Pasquale Minervini et al.ACL Findings 2025 · 6 citations
  3. MPO: Multilingual Safety Alignment via Reward Gap OptimizationWeixiang Zhao, Yulin Hu, Yang Deng, Tongtong Wu et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
  4. Crosslingual Generalization through Multitask FinetuningNiklas Muennighoff, Thomas Wang, Lintang Sutawika, Adam Roberts et al.ACL 2023 · 319 citations
  5. The Heterogeneous Safety Impacts of Benign Multilingual Fine-TuningWill Hawkins, Kai Rawal, Jonathan Rystrøm, Stratis Tsirtsis et al.ICML 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines