How Well Do Sparse ImageNet Models Transfer?
Eugenia Iofinova, Alexandra Peste, Mark Kurtz, Dan Alistarh
Abstract
Transfer learning is a classic paradigm by which models pretrained on large "upstream" datasets are adapted to yield good results on "downstream" specialized datasets. Generally, more accurate models on the "upstream" dataset tend to provide better transfer accuracy "downstream". In this work, we perform an in-depth investigation of this phenomenon in the context of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on the ImageNet dataset, which have been pruned-that is, compressed by sparsifiying their connections. We consider transfer using unstructured pruned models obtained by applying several stateof-the-art pruning methods, including magnitude-based, second-order, re-growth, lottery-ticket, and regularization approaches, in the context of twelve standard transfer tasks. In a nutshell, our study shows that sparse models can match or even outperform the transfer performance of dense models, even at high sparsities, and, while doing so, can lead to significant inference and even training speedups. At the same time, we observe and analyze significant differences in the behaviour of different pruning methods. The code is available at: https://github.com/IST- DASLab/sparse-imagenet-transfer.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77fdb73c-74b4-4bcf-ba09-6ac9111c55cbCited by top-tier papers20
- E2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt TuningCheng Han, Qifan Wang, Yiming Cui, Zhiwen Cao et al.ICCV 2023 · 108 citations
- Visual Fourier Prompt TuningRunjia Zeng, Cheng Han, Qifan Wang, Chunshu Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 58 citations
- FIARSE: Model-Heterogeneous Federated Learning via Importance-Aware Submodel ExtractionFeijie Wu, Xingchen Wang, Yaqing Wang, Tianci Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 47 citations
- Facing the Elephant in the Room: Visual Prompt Tuning or Full finetuning?Cheng Han, Qifan Wang, Yiming Cui, Wenguan Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 43 citations
- Dynamic Sparse Training with Structured SparsityMike Lasby, Anna Golubeva, Utku Evci, Mihai Nica et al.ICLR 2024 · 37 citations
Builds on17
- YOLACT: Real-Time Instance SegmentationDaniel Bolya, Chong Zhou, Fanyi Xiao, Yong Jae LeeICCV 2019 · 2,075 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-TuningVictor Sanh, Thomas Wolf, Alexander M. RushNeurIPS 2020 · 656 citations
Related papers
- The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Object RecognitionSharath Girish, Shishira R. Maiya, Kamal Gupta, Hao Chen et al.CVPR 2021
- Robust Tickets Can Transfer Better: Drawing More Transferable Subnetworks in Transfer LearningYonggan Fu, Ye Yuan, Shang Wu, Jiayi Yuan et al.DAC 2023 · 1 citation
- Data-Efficient Double-Win Lottery Tickets from Robust Pre-trainingTianlong Chen, Zhenyu Zhang, Sijia Liu, Yang Zhang et al.ICML 2022 · 8 citations
- SparseProp: Efficient Sparse Backpropagation for Faster Training of Neural Networks at the EdgeMahdi Nikdan, Tommaso Pegolotti, Eugenia Iofinova, Eldar Kurtic et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
- TransTailor: Pruning the Pre-trained Model for Improved Transfer LearningBingyan Liu, Yifeng Cai, Yao Guo, Xiangqun ChenAAAI 2021 · 69 citations
