Towards a Formal Theory of Representational Compositionality
Eric Elmoznino, Thomas Jiralerspong, Yoshua Bengio, Guillaume Lajoie
Abstract
Compositionality is believed to be fundamental to intelligence. In humans, it underlies the structure of thought and language. In AI, it enables a powerful form of out-of-distribution generalization, in which a model systematically adapts to novel combinations of known concepts. However, while we have strong intuitions about what compositionality is, we lack satisfying formal definitions for it. Here, we propose such a definition called representational compositionality that is conceptually simple, quantitative, and grounded in algorithmic information theory. Intuitively, representational compositionality states that a compositional representation is both expressive and describable as a simple function of parts. We validate our definition on both real and synthetic data, and show how it unifies disparate intuitions from across the literature in both AI and cognitive science. We hope that our definition can inspire the design of novel, theoretically-driven models that better capture the mechanisms of compositional thought. We make our code available here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 778c5bb2-5366-4dfc-ab6b-b6fe10b02877Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on28
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,275 citations
- Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate GenerationEmmanuel Bengio, Moksh Jain, Maksym Korablyov, Doina Precup et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 565 citations
- Weakly supervised causal representation learningJohann Brehmer, Pim de Haan, Phillip Lippe, Taco S. CohenNeurIPS 2022 · 196 citations
- CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened SequencesPhillip Lippe, Sara Magliacane, Sindy Löwe, Yuki M. Asano et al.ICML 2022 · 136 citations
Related papers
- Compositionality and Generalization In Emergent LanguagesRahma Chaabouni, Eugene Kharitonov, Diane Bouchacourt, Emmanuel Dupoux et al.ACL 2020 · 40 citations
- CtD: Composition through Decomposition in Emergent CommunicationBoaz Carmeli, Ron Meir, Yonatan BelinkovICLR 2025
- Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?Arnas Uselis, Andrea Dittadi, Seong Joon OhICML 2025
- The role of Disentanglement in GeneralisationMilton Llera Montero, Casimir J. H. Ludwig, Rui Ponte Costa, Gaurav Malhotra et al.ICLR 2021 · 97 citations
- Rule Extrapolation in Language Modeling: A Study of Compositional Generalization on OOD PromptsAnna Mészáros, Szilvia Ujváry, Wieland Brendel, Patrik Reizinger et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
