USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Exorcising "Wraith": Protecting LiDAR-based Object Detector in Automated Driving System from Appearing Attacks
Qifan Xiao, Xudong Pan, Yifan Lu, Mi Zhang, Jiarun Dai, Min Yang
Abstract
Automated driving systems rely on 3D object detectors to recognize possible obstacles from LiDAR point clouds. However, recent works show the adversary can forge non-existent cars in the prediction results with a few fake points (i.e., appearing attack). By removing statistical outliers, existing defenses are however designed for specific attacks or biased by predefined heuristic rules. Towards more comprehensive mitigation, we first systematically inspect the mechanism of recent appearing attacks: Their common weaknesses are observed in crafting fake obstacles which (i) have obvious differences in the local parts compared with real obstacles and (ii) violate the physical relation between depth and point density. In this paper, we propose a novel plug-and-play defensive module which works by side of a trained LiDAR-based object detector to eliminate forged obstacles where a major proportion of local parts have low objectness, i.e., to what degree it belongs to a real object. At the core of our module is a local objectness predictor, which explicitly incorporates the depth information to model the relation between depth and point density, and predicts each local part of an obstacle with an objectness score. Extensive experiments show, our proposed defense eliminates at least 70% cars forged by three known appearing attacks in most cases, while, for the best previous defense, less than 30% forged cars are eliminated. Meanwhile, under the same circumstance, our defense incurs less overhead for AP/precision on cars compared with existing defenses. Furthermore, We validate the effectiveness of our proposed defense on simulation-based closed-loop control driving tests in the open-source system of Baidu's Apollo.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 772269a7-c58b-4c93-b92e-721b1fade974Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- Seeing isn't Believing: Towards More Robust Adversarial Attack Against Real World Object DetectorsYue Zhao, Hong Zhu, Ruigang Liang, Qintao Shen et al.CCS 2019 · 239 citations
- DUP-Net: Denoiser and Upsampler Network for 3D Adversarial Point Clouds DefenseHang Zhou, Kejiang Chen, Weiming Zhang, Han Fang et al.ICCV 2019 · 206 citations
Related papers
- You Can't See Me: Physical Removal Attacks on LiDAR-based Autonomous Vehicles Driving FrameworksYulong Cao, S. Hrushikesh Bhupathiraju, Pirouz Naghavi, Takeshi Sugawara et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Towards Real-Time Defense against Object-Based LiDAR Attacks in Autonomous DrivingYan Zhang, Zihao Liu, Yi Zhu, Chenglin MiaoCCS 2025
- On the Robustness Evaluation of 3D Obstacle Detection Against Specifications in Autonomous DrivingTri Minh-Triet Pham, Bo Yang, Jinqiu YangASE 2025 · 1 citation
- ADPerf: Investigating and Testing Performance in Autonomous Driving SystemsTri Minh-Triet Pham, Diego Elias Costa, Weiyi Shang, Jinqiu YangASE 2025
- Physically Realizable Adversarial Examples for LiDAR Object DetectionJames Tu, Mengye Ren, Sivabalan Manivasagam, Ming Liang et al.CVPR 2020
