Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

Who Gets to Define Safety? A Systematic Review of How Generative AI Research Addresses Youth Online Safety

Ozioma Collins Oguine, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Michael J. Muller, Karla Badillo-Urquiola

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

Generative AI is rapidly reshaping young people’s digital experiences, from providing emotional support to introducing new dimensions of risks. Yet, existing safety frameworks are not equipped to handle the unique risks posed by GenAI. To investigate how youth safety is being addressed in this new landscape, we conducted a systematic review of (N=30) GenAI-youth studies from 2014-2025. We found that GenAI-youth-related research was primarily led by AI experts with minimal involvement from youth development experts or young people themselves. Safety was typically framed as a technical system feature, optimized through filters, benchmarks, or guardrails, rather than a relational, contextual, and developmentally grounded concern. We call on the HCI community to re-evaluate its approach to participation in AI. We must move beyond reactive, system-driven GenAI approaches to youth safety towards a more holistic, proactive model where multistakeholder inclusion is a core aspect throughout the AI-lifecycle, leading to safer and equitable systems.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get 770d8fa7-32ea-4c9c-88c7-b1dbfc93c69a

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines