The Potential of Diverse Youth as Stakeholders in Identifying and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias for a Future of Fairer AI
Jaemarie Solyst, Ellia Yang, Shixian Xie, Amy Ogan, Jessica Hammer, Motahhare Eslami
Abstract
Youth regularly use technology driven by artificial intelligence (AI). However, it is increasingly well-known that AI can cause harm on small and large scales, especially for those underrepresented in tech fields. Recently, users have played active roles in surfacing and mitigating harm from algorithmic bias. Despite being frequent users of AI, youth have been under-explored as potential contributors and stakeholders to the future of AI. We consider three notions that may be at the root of youth facing barriers to playing an active role in responsible AI, which are youth (1) cannot understand the technical aspects of AI, (2) cannot understand the ethical issues around AI, and (3) need protection from serious topics related to bias and injustice. In this study, we worked with youth (N = 30) in first through twelfth grade and parents (N = 6) to explore how youth can be part of identifying algorithmic bias and designing future systems to address problematic technology behavior. We found that youth are capable of identifying and articulating algorithmic bias, often in great detail. Participants suggested different ways users could give feedback for AI that reflects their values of diversity and inclusion. Youth who may have less experience with computing or exposure to societal structures can be supported by peers or adults with more of this knowledge, leading to critical conversations about fairer AI. This work illustrates youths' insights, suggesting that they should be integrated in building a future of responsible AI.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 1fa36ca9-1231-4791-986c-238302e0dd09Cited by top-tier papers4
- WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AIWesley Hanwen Deng, Claire Wang, Howard Ziyu Han, Jason I. Hong et al.CSCW 2025 · 12 citations
- Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI ModelLuis Morales-Navarro, Michelle A. Gan, Evelyn Yu, Lauren Vogelstein et al.CSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Understanding Young People's Creative Goals with Augmented RealityAmna Liaqat, Fannie Liu, Brian Berengard, Jiaxun Cao et al.CSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to EvaluationAdriana Alvarado Garcia, Ruyuan Wan, Ozioma Collins Oguine, Karla Badillo-UrquiolaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic HarmGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2023 · 30 citations
- Who Gets to Define Safety? A Systematic Review of How Generative AI Research Addresses Youth Online SafetyOzioma Collins Oguine, Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Michael J. Muller, Karla Badillo-UrquiolaCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Intersectional AI: A Study of How Information Science Students Think about Ethics and Their ImpactNora McDonald, Shimei PanCSCW 2020 · 43 citations
- "I Would Like to Design": Black Girls Analyzing and Ideating Fair and Accountable AIJaemarie Solyst, Shixian Xie, Ellia Yang, Angela E. B. Stewart et al.CHI 2023 · 43 citations
- Principles of Safe AI Companions for Youth: Parent and Expert PerspectivesYaman Yu, Mohi, Aishi Debroy, Xin Cao et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
