Intrinsic Goals for Autonomous Agents: Model-Based Exploration in Virtual Zebrafish Predicts Ethological Behavior and Whole-Brain Dynamics
Reece Keller, Alyn Kirsch, Felix Pei, Xaq Pitkow, Leo Kozachkov, Aran Nayebi
Abstract
Autonomy is a hallmark of animal intelligence, enabling adaptive and intelligent behavior in complex environments without relying on external reward or task structure. Existing reinforcement learning approaches to exploration in reward-free environments, including a class of methods known as model-based intrinsic motivation, exhibit inconsistent exploration patterns and do not converge to an exploratory policy, thus failing to capture robust autonomous behaviors observed in animals. Moreover, systems neuroscience has largely overlooked the neural basis of autonomy, focusing instead on experimental paradigms where animals are motivated by external reward rather than engaging in ethological, naturalistic and task-independent behavior. To bridge these gaps, we introduce a novel model-based intrinsic drive explicitly designed after the principles of autonomous exploration in animals. Our method (3M-Progress) achieves animal-like exploration by tracking divergence between an online world model and a fixed prior learned from an ecological niche. To the best of our knowledge, we introduce the first autonomous embodied agent that predicts brain data entirely from self-supervised optimization of an intrinsic goal -- without any behavioral or neural training data -- demonstrating that 3M-Progress agents capture the explainable variance in behavioral patterns and whole-brain neural-glial dynamics recorded from autonomously behaving larval zebrafish, thereby providing the first goal-driven, population-level model of neural-glial computation. Our findings establish a computational framework connecting model-based intrinsic motivation to naturalistic behavior, providing a foundation for building artificial agents with animal-like autonomy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World ModelsRamanan Sekar, Oleh Rybkin, Kostas Daniilidis, Pieter Abbeel et al.ICML 2020 · 489 citations
- Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural RepresentationsAlex H. Williams, Erin Kunz, Simon Kornblith, Scott W. LindermanNeurIPS 2021 · 182 citations
- Discovering and Achieving Goals via World ModelsRussell Mendonca, Oleh Rybkin, Kostas Daniilidis, Danijar Hafner et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 177 citations
- Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodentJosh Merel, Diego Aldarondo, Jesse Marshall, Yuval Tassa et al.ICLR 2020 · 77 citations
- Increasing Liquid State Machine Performance with Edge-of-Chaos Dynamics Organized by Astrocyte-modulated PlasticityVladimir A. Ivanov, Konstantinos P. MichmizosNeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
Related papers
- Mutual Information State Intrinsic ControlRui Zhao, Yang Gao, Pieter Abbeel, Volker Tresp et al.ICLR 2021 · 25 citations
- Information is Power: Intrinsic Control via Information CaptureNicholas Rhinehart, Jenny Wang, Glen Berseth, John D. Co-Reyes et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 14 citations
- Learning with AMIGo: Adversarially Motivated Intrinsic GoalsAndres Campero, Roberta Raileanu, Heinrich Küttler, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICLR 2021 · 48 citations
- Deep RL Needs Deep Behavior Analysis: Exploring Implicit Planning by Model-Free Agents in Open-Ended EnvironmentsRiley Simmons-Edler, Ryan Paul Badman, Felix Baastad Berg, Raymond Chua et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Beyond Noisy-TVs: Noise-Robust Exploration Via Learning Progress MonitoringZhibo Hou, Zhiyu An, Wan DuICLR 2026 · 3 citations
