Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
Suyuchen Wang, Jinlin Wang, Xinyu Wang, Shiqi Li, Xiangru Tang, Sirui Hong, Xiao-Wen Chang, Chenglin Wu, Bang Liu
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information. Existing approaches either rely on expensive supervised fine-tuning to generate evidence post-answer or train models to perform web searches without necessarily improving utilization of the given context. We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate incontext evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities. Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation performance through strategically retrieved incontext tokens in the reasoning chain. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world and counterfactual QA benchmarks demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms supervised fine-tuning, traditional retrievalaugmented generation methods, and external retrieval solutions. This work represents a fundamental advancement in making LLMs more accurate, reliable, and efficient for knowledgeintensive tasks. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Resolving Evidence Sparsity: Agentic Context Engineering for Long-Document UnderstandingKeliang Liu, Zizhi Chen, Mingcheng Li, Jingqun Tang et al.CVPR 2026 · 19 citations
- LongRLVR: Long-Context Reinforcement Learning Requires Verifiable Context RewardsGuanzheng Chen, Michael Qizhe Shieh, Lidong BingICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- From Evidence to Trajectory: Abductive Reasoning Path Synthesis for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agents DevelopmentMuzhi Li, Jinhu Qi, Yihong Wu, Minghao Zhao et al.KDD 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
Related papers
- Conflict-Aware Soft Prompting for Retrieval-Augmented GenerationEunseong Choi, June Park, Hyeri Lee, Jongwuk LeeEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Search-in-the-Chain: Interactively Enhancing Large Language Models with Search for Knowledge-intensive TasksShicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng et al.WWW 2024 · 104 citations
- Search and Refine During Think: Facilitating Knowledge Refinement for Improved Retrieval-Augmented ReasoningYaorui Shi, Sihang Li, Chang Wu, Zhiyuan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
- RetroLLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Retrieve Fine-grained Evidence within GenerationXiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin, Yujia Zhou, Yongkang Wu et al.ACL 2025
- RARE: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language ModelsHieu Tran, Zonghai Yao, Zhichao Yang, Junda Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 27 citations
