Lune

AAAI2024Top-tier venue

Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks

Anastasia Antsiferova, Khaled Abud, Aleksandr Gushchin, Ekaterina Shumitskaya, Sergey Lavrushkin, Dmitriy S. Vatolin

2024Year
21Citations
5Top-tier citations

Abstract

Nowadays, neural-network-based image- and video-quality metrics perform better than traditional methods. However, they also became more vulnerable to adversarial attacks that increase metrics' scores without improving visual quality. The existing benchmarks of quality metrics compare their performance in terms of correlation with subjective quality and calculation time. Nonetheless, the adversarial robustness of image-quality metrics is also an area worth researching. This paper analyses modern metrics' robustness to different adversarial attacks. We adapted adversarial attacks from computer vision tasks and compared attacks' efficiency against 15 no-reference image- and video-quality metrics. Some metrics showed high resistance to adversarial attacks, which makes their usage in benchmarks safer than vulnerable metrics. The benchmark accepts submissions of new metrics for researchers who want to make their metrics more robust to attacks or to find such metrics for their needs. The latest results can be found online: https://videoprocessing.ai/benchmarks/metrics-robustness.html.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 769876e9-6f44-49f7-843f-782f11409af6

Cited by top-tier papers5

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on3

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines