Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks
Anastasia Antsiferova, Khaled Abud, Aleksandr Gushchin, Ekaterina Shumitskaya, Sergey Lavrushkin, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
Abstract
Nowadays, neural-network-based image- and video-quality metrics perform better than traditional methods. However, they also became more vulnerable to adversarial attacks that increase metrics' scores without improving visual quality. The existing benchmarks of quality metrics compare their performance in terms of correlation with subjective quality and calculation time. Nonetheless, the adversarial robustness of image-quality metrics is also an area worth researching. This paper analyses modern metrics' robustness to different adversarial attacks. We adapted adversarial attacks from computer vision tasks and compared attacks' efficiency against 15 no-reference image- and video-quality metrics. Some metrics showed high resistance to adversarial attacks, which makes their usage in benchmarks safer than vulnerable metrics. The benchmark accepts submissions of new metrics for researchers who want to make their metrics more robust to attacks or to find such metrics for their needs. The latest results can be found online: https://videoprocessing.ai/benchmarks/metrics-robustness.html.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 769876e9-6f44-49f7-843f-782f11409af6Cited by top-tier papers5
- Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on No-Reference Image Quality Models with Gradient Norm RegularizationYujia Liu, Chenxi Yang, Dingquan Li, Jianhao Ding et al.CVPR 2024 · 15 citations
- BiRQA: Bidirectional Robust Quality Assessment for ImagesAleksandr Gushchin, Dmitriy Vatolin, Anastasia AntsiferovaICML 2026 · 1 citation
- One Surrogate to Fool Them All: Universal, Transferable, and Targeted Adversarial Attacks with CLIPBinyan Xu, Xilin Dai, Di Tang, Kehuan ZhangCCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality MetricsAleksandr Gushchin, Khaled Abud, Georgii Bychkov, Ekaterina Shumitskaya et al.ICML 2025
- Saving Foundation Flow-Matching Priors for Inverse ProblemsYuxiang Wan, Ryan Devera, Wenjie Zhang, Ju SunICML 2026
Builds on3
- Neural Optimal TransportAlexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny BurnaevICLR 2023 · 151 citations
- Norm-in-Norm Loss with Faster Convergence and Better Performance for Image Quality AssessmentDingquan Li, Tingting Jiang, Ming JiangACM MM 2020 · 86 citations
- Perceptual Quality Assessment of Smartphone PhotographyYuming Fang, Hanwei Zhu, Yan Zeng, Kede Ma et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- IOI: Invisible One-Iteration Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality MetricsEkaterina Shumitskaya, Anastasia Antsiferova, Dmitriy S. VatolinICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Vulnerabilities in Video Quality Assessment Models: The Challenge of Adversarial AttacksAoxiang Zhang, Yu Ran, Weixuan Tang, Yuan-Gen WangNeurIPS 2023 · 19 citations
- Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-LoopWeixia Zhang, Dingquan Li, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 55 citations
- WAVES: Benchmarking the Robustness of Image WatermarksBang An, Mucong Ding, Tahseen Rabbani, Aakriti Agrawal et al.ICML 2024 · 86 citations
- Adversarial Example Quality Assessment: A Large-scale Dataset and Strong BaselineJia-Li Yin, Menghao Chen, Jin Han, Bo-Hao Chen et al.ACM MM 2024 · 1 citation
